2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-44871-6_43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Log-linear Models and Weighted Dissimilarity Measures

Abstract: Abstract. We compare two successful discriminative classification algorithms on three databases from the UCI and STATLOG repositories. The two approaches are the log-linear model for the class posterior probabilities and class-dependent weighted dissimilarity measures for nearest neighbor classifiers. The experiments show that the maximum entropy based log-linear classifier performs better for the equivalent of a single prototype. On the other hand, using multiple prototypes the weighted dissimilarity measures… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linear models can be extended in a number of ways to represent non-linear decision surfaces [Keysers et al, 2003, Bishop, 2006, Chang et al, 2010. The simplest way is mapping the original feature vectors to transformed ones, examples of which are factor decompositions Bernick, 1964, Blei et al, 2003], word pair features [Lesk, 1969], and explicit polynomial mappings [Chang et al, 2010].…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear models can be extended in a number of ways to represent non-linear decision surfaces [Keysers et al, 2003, Bishop, 2006, Chang et al, 2010. The simplest way is mapping the original feature vectors to transformed ones, examples of which are factor decompositions Bernick, 1964, Blei et al, 2003], word pair features [Lesk, 1969], and explicit polynomial mappings [Chang et al, 2010].…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%