1994
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1994.03510380044035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Long-term Prognosis of Patients With AIDS Treated and Not Treated With Zidovudine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this group of immunodeficient patients antiretroviral treatment was uniformly recommended throughout the study period, and selection bias was therefore unlikely. Other cohort studies have also shown a beneficial, although transient, effect of zidovudine monotherapy 23 24. The effect of different treatment strategies will depend on the type of drug or drug combinations used and on previous exposure to antiretrovirals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this group of immunodeficient patients antiretroviral treatment was uniformly recommended throughout the study period, and selection bias was therefore unlikely. Other cohort studies have also shown a beneficial, although transient, effect of zidovudine monotherapy 23 24. The effect of different treatment strategies will depend on the type of drug or drug combinations used and on previous exposure to antiretrovirals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although zidovudine clearly prolongs survival in advanced HIV disease, 7 recent studies have indicated that survival is prolonged only for one to two years. [26][27][28][29] Our previous study of access to therapy for HIV disease indicated that after adjustment for the CD4 cell count, whites were more likely than nonwhites to receive antiretroviral therapy and pneumocystis prophylaxis before their initial visit to the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinic. 14 This subsequent analysis has shown no difference in survival between whites and nonwhites, yet has shown a significantly increased risk of death for persons receiving antiretroviral therapy before enrollment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, AZT has been shown to be toxic in HIV-positives and proposed as a possible cause of AIDS diseases since 1991 (Duesberg, 1991(Duesberg, , 1992c(Duesberg, , 1992a(Duesberg, , 1992b. Recently, the European 'Concorde tri-57 al' (Seligmann et al, 1994) and several other studies have shown that, contrary to earlier claims, AZT does not prevent AIDS (Oddone et al, 1993;Tokars et al, 1993;Lenderking et al, 1994;Lundgren et al, 1994). The Concorde trial even showed that the mortality of healthy, AZT-treated HIV-carriers was 25% higher than that of placebo-treated controls (Seligmann et al, 1994).…”
Section: Mortality Of Hemophiliacs With and Without Hivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the alleged ability of AZT to prevent AIDS has recently been discredited by several large clinical trials (Oddone et al, 1993;Tokars et al, 1993;Goedert et al, 1994;Lenderking et al, 1994;Lundgren et al, 1994;Seligmann et al, 1994). Moreover, all studies of AZT treatments have confirmed the unavoidable cytotoxicity of DNA chain terminators (Duesberg, 1992;Oddone et al, 1993;Tokars et al, 1993;Lenderking et al, 1994;Lundgren et al, 1994;Seligmann et al, 1994). One study observed a 25% increased mortality (Seligmann et al, 1994), and another a 4.5-fold higher annual AIDS risk and a 2.4-fold higher annual death risk in AZT-treated HIVpositive hemophiliacs compared to untreated controls (Goedert et al, 1994).…”
Section: Treatment and Prevention Of Aidsmentioning
confidence: 99%