Nuclear Data for Science and Technology 1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-7099-1_83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Measured and Evaluated Spectrum-Averaged Cross-Section Data for Reactor Neutron Metrology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a survey in the literature [7 -11] indicates that the relevant experimental data are old (more than a decade) and a marked discrepancy still exists between calculated and measured values of CT for several threshold reactions (see for example references [7] and [11]). Furthermore, the uncertainties in the contemporary knowledge of these cross sections are in general somewhat larger than is desirable for dosimetry applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a survey in the literature [7 -11] indicates that the relevant experimental data are old (more than a decade) and a marked discrepancy still exists between calculated and measured values of CT for several threshold reactions (see for example references [7] and [11]). Furthermore, the uncertainties in the contemporary knowledge of these cross sections are in general somewhat larger than is desirable for dosimetry applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legacy dosimetry files, e.g., DOSDAM77 [1] and IRDF-90 [2], addressed isotopic-specific reactions of interest for dosimetry monitoring applications. However, most applications use elemental, and not isotopically enriched, activation sensors.…”
Section: Activation Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first part of the experiment [1] attention was paid to install an adequate irradiation device near the reactor core, to characterize the neutron spectrum at the irradiation position and to measure averaged neutron cross sections for a particular set of threshold reactions. In the present paper, another important set of threshold reactions, listed in Table 1, was investigated as an effort to establish the origin of some discrepancies between calculated and measured values of σ (see for example references [2,3] and [4]) and to provide new experimental information on these parameters with lower overall uncertainties than those reported in the literature. The reactions 55 Mn(n,2n) and 58 Ni(n,2n) have again been included in this study because of the very discrepant σ result reported recently by Horibe [5] for the former reaction and because of the large difference (50%) [3] which still exists between calculated and measured values of σ for the latter reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%