2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells derived from gingival tissue and periodontal ligament in different incubation conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

17
203
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
17
203
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, PDLSC express numerous markers characteristic of other MSC sources, including CD146, CD105, CD90, CD29 and STRO-1 [33] . Under certain conditions, such as culture with BMP-2 or -7, PDLSC also express MSC markers such as CD44 and CD73 [30] .…”
Section: Profiling and Identitysupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected, PDLSC express numerous markers characteristic of other MSC sources, including CD146, CD105, CD90, CD29 and STRO-1 [33] . Under certain conditions, such as culture with BMP-2 or -7, PDLSC also express MSC markers such as CD44 and CD73 [30] .…”
Section: Profiling and Identitysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…PDLSC also express cementum protein 1, which is associated with a cementoblastic phenotype and reduced osteoblastic differentiation [30] . While PDLSC show mineralization under osteoinductive culture conditions, they also show multilineage differentiation potential and undergo adipogenesis or chondrogenesis under appropriate culture conditions [33] . PDLSC differ in important ways from the previously discussed DPSC, although they are often interchanged.…”
Section: Profiling and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gingiva from the maxillofacial region may be considered as a favorable source of mesenchymal stem cells as the harvesting of stem cells from the mandible or maxilla can be performed easily under local anesthesia (19). Furthermore, harvesting stem cells from the gingiva may be more practical when compared with the bone marrow of the maxilla and mandible as it is less invasive and has less complications, including paresthesia and pain (20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results agree with other studies devoted to gingival MMSC that reported similar phenotype characteristics, differentiation potential and stable genomic behavior. 19,39,40 Also, we determined high proliferative capacity of AMC which remained constant from primary to long-term cultures. It should be noted that the population doubling time for bone marrowderived MMSC reaches only 55 § 3 hours under similar cultivation conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%