2014
DOI: 10.2478/sjph-2014-0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods for detection of four common nosocomial pathogens on hospital textiles

Abstract: Introduction: Although the most common vehicle for transmission of health-care acquired infections is the personto-person transmission route, the role of environment should not be ignored and hospital linen may contribute to

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-destructive elution method using the Morapex A device (Mathis AG, Switzerland) 33 was used to retrieve the bacteria from the textiles. This method has already been proven to be an efficient replacement of the simple vortexing method with saline solution and added Tween 80.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The non-destructive elution method using the Morapex A device (Mathis AG, Switzerland) 33 was used to retrieve the bacteria from the textiles. This method has already been proven to be an efficient replacement of the simple vortexing method with saline solution and added Tween 80.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has already been proven to be an efficient replacement of the simple vortexing method with saline solution and added Tween 80. 33,34 Briefly, 20 mL of test liquid containing 0.9% NaCl and 0.2% solution of polysorbate (Tween 80, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was pressed through the textile swatch at a cycle of 15 s. This cycle was conducted three times. The extract was then collected in a test tube.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the swabbing technique is widely used, it lacks the standardized conditions necessary for reproducible results [15]. Currently, studies on the recovery of bacteria using both swab and contact plate sampling methods are primarily conducted in controlled laboratory environments with single or multiple bacterial species [15,[19][20][21]. However, in real medical environments, the bacterial community consists of various bacteria originating from soil and skin surfaces and other organic matter [22].…”
Section: According To the 2022 Who Global Report On Infection Prevent...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the swabbing technique is widely used, it lacks the standardized conditions necessary for reproducible results [ 15 ]. Currently, studies on the recovery of bacteria using both swab and contact plate sampling methods are primarily conducted in controlled laboratory environments with single or multiple bacterial species [ 15 , 19 – 21 ]. However, in real medical environments, the bacterial community consists of various bacteria originating from soil and skin surfaces and other organic matter [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%