2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-003-0331-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods for developing dynamic reduced models for design optimization

Abstract: In this paper we compare three methods for forming reduced models to speed up genetic-algorithmbased optimization. The methods work by forming functional approximations of the fitness function which are used to speed up the GA optimization by making the genetic operators more informed. Empirical results in several engineering design domains are presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main idea of the IOs is to replace pure randomness in traditional GA operators with decisions that are guided by reduced models formed using the methods presented in [5,6,7]. The reduced models are approximations of the fitness function, formed using some approximation techniques, such as least squares approximation [5,7,8].…”
Section: Objective Exchange Genetic Algorithm For Design Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main idea of the IOs is to replace pure randomness in traditional GA operators with decisions that are guided by reduced models formed using the methods presented in [5,6,7]. The reduced models are approximations of the fitness function, formed using some approximation techniques, such as least squares approximation [5,7,8].…”
Section: Objective Exchange Genetic Algorithm For Design Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They evaluate a large part of the population with an ANN and a small part is still simultaneously evaluated with the original function. Rasheed et al propose to cluster data and to construct separate approximation models for the different clusters [30,32,29]. The approximation model can be used each time or alternatively with the real objective function.…”
Section: Replace the Evaluation Function By A Datamining Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A step forward to enhance the efficiency of the implemented optimization tool corresponds to the introduction of modeling techniques. The model introduced in this paper follows a supervised learning strategy based on Support Vectors Machines [9] which, together with an evolutionary strategy, are used to create "feasibility" models to efficiently prune the design search space during the optimization process, therefore, reducing the overall number of required evaluations [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%