1968
DOI: 10.1136/adc.43.227.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods for evaluating surface properties of lung in perinatal period.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bubble clicking occurs in lung foam (20,21) and is absent in bubbles from the lungs of babies who die from hyaline membrane disease (8). We first observed clicking in amniotic fluid bubbles (17,18) and pharyngeal aspirate (19); the results correlated with the L/S ratio and incidence o f RDS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Bubble clicking occurs in lung foam (20,21) and is absent in bubbles from the lungs of babies who die from hyaline membrane disease (8). We first observed clicking in amniotic fluid bubbles (17,18) and pharyngeal aspirate (19); the results correlated with the L/S ratio and incidence o f RDS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…
In the preceding paper (Gandy, Jacobson, and but are not found in infants dying from hyaline Gairdner, 1970) histological studies of human lung membrane disease (HMD) in the first few days of have shown that the presence of osmiophilic life. However, the role of surfactant deficiency in granules correlates well with the presence of HMD remains debatable; though such deficiency surfactant.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…of a saline extract of lung homogenate was measured on a Wilhelmy balance as described previously (Gandy et al, 1968).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the stability of bubbles expressed from lung tissue was examined in 56/84 cases; the presence or absence of bubble 'clicking' was noted in all 56, the bubble stability ratio (SR) was determined in 40 cases. The methods used for these measurements were those previously described (Gandy et al, 1968).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%