2014
DOI: 10.4238/2014.april.29.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods for high quantity and quality genomic DNA extraction from raw cow milk

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Isolation of sufficient quantities of high quality DNA is a prerequisite for molecular studies. Milk somatic cells can be used; however, inhibitors such as fats and proteins make milk a difficult medium for extracting large amounts of quality DNA. We optimized, evaluated and compared three methods, Modified Nucleospin Blood Kit method, Modified TianGen Kit method and Phenol-Chloroform method for genomic DNA extraction from bovine milk. Individual cows' milk and bulk milk samples were collected from a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intermittent shedding of organisms and potential inhibitors present in milk may reduce the sensitivity of current antigen and molecular detection tests, most likely through high lipid content or binding of mycoplasma to milk proteins and subsequent loss during DNA extraction (Hotzel et al., ; Sachse et al., ; Usman, Yu, Liu, Fan, & Wang, ). Anecdotal observations suggest that improved sampling methods, such as the use of “flocked” and pre‐wetted swabs, for nasal sampling may improve mycoplasma antigen detection, but this has yet to be formally validated.…”
Section: Gap Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intermittent shedding of organisms and potential inhibitors present in milk may reduce the sensitivity of current antigen and molecular detection tests, most likely through high lipid content or binding of mycoplasma to milk proteins and subsequent loss during DNA extraction (Hotzel et al., ; Sachse et al., ; Usman, Yu, Liu, Fan, & Wang, ). Anecdotal observations suggest that improved sampling methods, such as the use of “flocked” and pre‐wetted swabs, for nasal sampling may improve mycoplasma antigen detection, but this has yet to be formally validated.…”
Section: Gap Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the concentration of somatic cells in 1 mL of milk (usually 2 × 10 4 to 4 × 10 5 ) is much lower than the concentration of leukocytes in 1 mL of blood (usually 4 × 10 6 to 10 × 10 6 ), and despite the fact that milk contains inhibitors such as fat and protein, the isolation of DNA from milk is feasible ( 13 14 15 16 ). Hitherto known methods of DNA extraction from milk somatic cells are often time consuming, expensive, and require a relatively large volume of milk (15–50 mL) and use of toxic reagents ( 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ). Bearing in mind the aforementioned, a new, fast, nontoxic, and inexpensive method of DNA isolation from small amounts of raw milk was developed at the Department of Cattle Breeding at the University of Agriculture in Krakow (patent application number: P.404 447 in Poland).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extraction of high-quality, intact, double-stranded, highquantity, protein, and PCR inhibitor-free gDNA is a primary requisite for successful and reproducible genomic analysis and other molecular biology applications. 12 Several organic extraction methods, 13 nonorganic extraction methods, 13 and spin column-based extraction methods 2,14,15 are known and used extensively. The use of these methods is, however, limited by the following: 1) use of toxic and/or expensive reagents, 2) being laborious, 3) the requirement of large numbers of steps, 4) extended hands-on time, and 5) cost, among others.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%