2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.05.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of microstructure and chemical durability of Ce0.9Gd0.1PO4 ceramics prepared by hot-press and pressureless sintering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hot-press sintering offers several advantages over conventional methods, primarily the very low temperature required for densi cation. 14,21,22) When the hot-pressed sintering entered the sintering stage (at suf ciently high temperature), the assistance in high compressive stress led to effective plastic deformation and compaction results, but the coarsening phenomenon easily resulted in the lower hardness of the 1400 C-sintered specimens. Thus, it is reasonable to speculate that the minor difference in the hardness resulted from the relative density, SPS and grain size effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hot-press sintering offers several advantages over conventional methods, primarily the very low temperature required for densi cation. 14,21,22) When the hot-pressed sintering entered the sintering stage (at suf ciently high temperature), the assistance in high compressive stress led to effective plastic deformation and compaction results, but the coarsening phenomenon easily resulted in the lower hardness of the 1400 C-sintered specimens. Thus, it is reasonable to speculate that the minor difference in the hardness resulted from the relative density, SPS and grain size effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dissolution experiments of La 0.666 Nd 0.167 Sm 0.167 PO 4 monazite ceramics were performed at 363 K in pH = 5, 7, and 9 solutions to assess the chemical stability of ceramics in geological environment and to gain a general understanding of lanthanides leaching activity. Previous studies reveal that the weak leaching resistance of monazite ceramics has been found in different leachates at initial 7 days owing to surface defect caused by mechanical polishing, 32 and that the stable state corresponding to dissolution–diffusion phenomenon has been established after 21 days with an LR value of ∼10 −6 –10 −5 g/m 2 in pH = 5 solution 35 . It should be noted that the updated leachates in previous studies were not digested with strong acid prior to ion concentration measurements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies reveal that the weak leaching resistance of monazite ceramics has been found in different leachates at initial 7 days owing to surface defect caused by mechanical polishing, 32 and that the stable state corresponding to dissolution-diffusion phenomenon has been established after 21 days with an LR value of ∼10 −6 -10 −5 g/m 2 in pH = 5 solution. 35 It should be noted that the updated leachates in previous studies were not digested with strong acid prior to ion concentration measurements. Figure 7A presents the evolution of the normalized elemental leach rates (LR) of Ln elements (Ln = La, Nd, and Sm) in pH = 5 solutions pretreated with strong HCl acid.…”
Section: Monazite Ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23. Monazite [12,16,17,18,87,89,140,141,231,235,244,293,331,332,333,334,335,336,337,338,339,340,341,342,343,344,345,346,347,348,349,350,351,352,353,354,355,356,357,358,359], Figure 23.…”
Section: Crystalline Ceramic Phasementioning
confidence: 99%