1996
DOI: 10.1016/0923-1811(95)00470-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of migration and invasiveness of epithelial tumor and melanoma cells in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10) On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that tumor metastasis is affected by the microenvironment of the target organs 22) and that the metastatic properties of tumor cells vary according to different kinds of tumor cells. 23) Therefore, the anti-metastatic effect of evodiamine was further examined in terms of the liver metastasis of colon 26-L5 cells and the lung metastasis of LLC cells. As shown in Table 1, the exposure of colon 26-L5 cells to 30 mM evodiamine before inoculation caused significant suppression (pϽ0.01) of liver metastasis, which was almost the same inhibition rate as that in lung metastasis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10) On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that tumor metastasis is affected by the microenvironment of the target organs 22) and that the metastatic properties of tumor cells vary according to different kinds of tumor cells. 23) Therefore, the anti-metastatic effect of evodiamine was further examined in terms of the liver metastasis of colon 26-L5 cells and the lung metastasis of LLC cells. As shown in Table 1, the exposure of colon 26-L5 cells to 30 mM evodiamine before inoculation caused significant suppression (pϽ0.01) of liver metastasis, which was almost the same inhibition rate as that in lung metastasis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invasion assays were performed in Boyden chambers containing polycarbonate filters with 8-m pore size (Costar, Bodenheim, Germany) essentially as described previously (Albini et al, 1987;Terranova et al, 1986;Wach et al, 1996). Filters were coated with a commercially available reconstituted basement membrane (Matrigel, diluted 1:3 in H 2 O; Becton Dickinson #356235, Heidelberg, Germany), fibronectin (1 g/ cm 2 , 12.5 nmol/filter; Becton Dickinson #40008), laminin-1 (5 g/cm 2 , 5 nmol/filter; Becton Dickinson #40232), tenascin (1 g/cm 2 , 1 nmol/filter; Becton Dickinson #40239), collagen type I (1 g/cm 2 , 6.5 nmol/filter; Becton Dickinson #40243), type II (1 g/ cm 2 , 6.5 nmol/filter; Becton Dickinson #40234), and type IV (1 g/cm 2 , 5 nmol/filter; Becton Dickinson #40233), vitronectin (50 ng/cm 2 , 1 nmol/filter; Becton Dickinson #40238), or HSPG (2 g/cm 2 , 1 nmol/filter; Becton Dickinson #40250).…”
Section: Invasion and Attachment Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gene expression profiling of the highly invasive and metastatic BLM and MV3 melanoma cell lines, 9,11,12 the low/moderate invasive A2058 and SK-mel28 cell lines 13,20 and the nonmetastatic WM164 cell line 21,22 followed by hierarchal cluster analysis showed the highly invasive and metastatic cell lines BLM and MV3 cell lines cluster together. Whereas, the melanoma cells lines A2058, SK-mel28, which display moderate to low invasive phenotypes, and WM164, which is not invasive, clustered together (Fig.…”
Section: Gene Expression Profiles Of Melanoma Cell Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the gene expression profiles of the various melanoma cell lines mirrored the invasive/metastatic phenotype described for those cell lines. 9,[11][12][13][20][21][22] Ontological characterization of gene expression profiles of the invasive melanoma cell lines BLM and MV3 compared to noninvasive WM164 line…”
Section: Gene Expression Profiles Of Melanoma Cell Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation