2003
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2003.602.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Mineral Requirements of Some Cultivars in Two Proteaceae Genera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were differences of some nutrient concentrations between cultivars of Leucospermum, as well as between those of Leucospermum and Protea, confirming what the literature mentioned on this subject (Parvin 1986;Cecil et al, 1995;Montarone et al, 2003). Na presented very high concentrations, specially in the cultivar 'Succession II', a fact that Alvarez et al (2012) had pointed out for proteas.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…There were differences of some nutrient concentrations between cultivars of Leucospermum, as well as between those of Leucospermum and Protea, confirming what the literature mentioned on this subject (Parvin 1986;Cecil et al, 1995;Montarone et al, 2003). Na presented very high concentrations, specially in the cultivar 'Succession II', a fact that Alvarez et al (2012) had pointed out for proteas.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…It is important to highlight that despite the fact that the K content was high in the soil of both cultivars, 'Tango' showed lower levels of foliar K than 'Succession II'. This supports the idea that nutrition in Proteaceae may differ within the same genus, the same species and even within cultivars of the same species (Claassens, 1986;Montarone et al, 2003;Hernández et al, 2008).…”
Section: Plant Nutritionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Fifteen years later, Montarone (2001) insisted that this information was still insufficient. This is understandable in light of the fact that nutrient needs of Proteaceae differ by genus and even by species (Claassens, 1986;Montarone et al, 2003). The latter authors studied the nutrition requirements of the genera Protea and Leucospermum and found that Leucospermum has a mineral uptake rate twice that of Protea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the results of numerous studies mentioned above,it can be established that the inconsistencies in the causes and alleviation of P toxicity in Proteaceae may be due to the fact that different genera and species of Proteaceae react differently to P, where in one species, a certain mineral nutrient may alleviate P toxicity, and in another species, it may aggravate it. Montarone et al (2003) confirmed in their study that large differences in mineral requirements exist between cultivars belonging to the same Proteaceae genus, with even larger differences between genera.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%