2016 46th European Microwave Conference (EuMC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/eumc.2016.7824308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of model order reduction techniques for digital predistortion of power amplifiers

Abstract: ©2016 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.This paper compares and discusses four\ud techniques for model order reduction based on compressed\ud sensing (CS), less relevant bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The running time depends on both the number of coefficients considered in the search and on the digital signal processor used for running the algorithm. However, by comparing the SW-OMP algorithm with the Less Relevant Basis Removal (LRBR) brute-force technique presented in [10] in terms of computational time, the OMP is 21 times faster, while the accuracy of the search is similar to that obtained with OMP. The computational complexity of the SW-OMP in comparison to the OMP is slightly higher due to the FFT transformations and filtering operations.…”
Section: E Other Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The running time depends on both the number of coefficients considered in the search and on the digital signal processor used for running the algorithm. However, by comparing the SW-OMP algorithm with the Less Relevant Basis Removal (LRBR) brute-force technique presented in [10] in terms of computational time, the OMP is 21 times faster, while the accuracy of the search is similar to that obtained with OMP. The computational complexity of the SW-OMP in comparison to the OMP is slightly higher due to the FFT transformations and filtering operations.…”
Section: E Other Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This paper is not aimed at providing an overview or comparison on the existing model order reduction techniques as found in [10]. Instead, in this paper an alternative approach to the classical OMP algorithm which is based on a spectral weighting strategy is proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polynomial-based DPD exhibits structural multicollinearity between predictors, enabling researchers to intelligently prune DPD coefficients that do not contribute to the efficacy of the DPD linearisation [3][4]. Authors of [5] allow for function reduction and a change of basis by employing Principal Component Analysis (PCA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Feature extraction techniques: creating a reduced set of new variables that are linear or nonlinear combinations of the original variables. Some examples of this group are the principal component analysis (PCA) [78], partial least squares (PLS) [79] and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) [80]. Feature extraction techniques (PCA, PLS and CCA) will be discussed in Subsection 4.1.2.…”
Section: Dimensionality Reduction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%