2010
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21170
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of multi‐subject ICA methods for analysis of fMRI data

Abstract: Spatial independent component analysis (ICA) applied to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data identifies functionally connected networks by estimating spatially independent patterns from their linearly mixed fMRI signals. Several multi-subject ICA approaches estimating subject-specific time courses (TCs) and spatial maps (SMs) have been developed, however there has not yet been a full comparison of the implications of their use. Here, we provide extensive comparisons of four multi-subject ICA appro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
661
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 672 publications
(681 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
661
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a first analysis step requiring minimal prior assumptions on data characteristics, we applied a multivariate group independent component analysis (ICA) (16)(17)(18)(19) to the data of 26 healthy subjects (13 pairs) in step A. This data-driven approach identified 16 maximally independent sources (components) that, together, account for the observed fMRI data of all subjects (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a first analysis step requiring minimal prior assumptions on data characteristics, we applied a multivariate group independent component analysis (ICA) (16)(17)(18)(19) to the data of 26 healthy subjects (13 pairs) in step A. This data-driven approach identified 16 maximally independent sources (components) that, together, account for the observed fMRI data of all subjects (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, the study sample was Caucasian and thus the generalizability of the findings across racial and ethnic groups should not be assumed. Fifth, the optimal ICA methodology for making group-level inferences from resting fMRI data is still an open question (Erhardt et al, 2011). Although our approach to ICA has been previously validated (Wang and Peterson, 2008), it is nonetheless possible that our methodology influenced our findings.…”
Section: Dmn-dlpfc Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The time courses of remaining 53 components for each subject and condition, which were computed from the group ICA time courses by a PCA‐based back‐reconstruction method [Erhardt et al, 2011], were used for the following FNC analyses [Allen et al, 2011; Doucet et al, 2011; Jafri et al, 2008]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%