2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2018.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction with serological tests and culture for diagnosing human brucellosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With the rapid development of molecular biology technology since the 1990s, molecular biological detection methods have been used to rapidly detect brucellosis at home and abroad [35][36][37]. For example, studies have shown that multiple real-time polymerase chain reactions can diagnose patients with negative serological tests, which makes up for the shortcomings of traditional serological tests and is considered an important detection method [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid development of molecular biology technology since the 1990s, molecular biological detection methods have been used to rapidly detect brucellosis at home and abroad [35][36][37]. For example, studies have shown that multiple real-time polymerase chain reactions can diagnose patients with negative serological tests, which makes up for the shortcomings of traditional serological tests and is considered an important detection method [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-time PCR provides more specific and higher sensitivity diagnostic solutions than conventional PCR. Notwithstanding, diagnostic tests including serology and PCR may have their own limitations depending upon the time of sampling and the onset of infection in the animal/patient [22,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definitive diagnosis of brucellosis is made by isolating the microorganism from the blood or various tissue samples (such as the bone marrow, synovial fluid, etc.) or by identifying the causative agent based on the results of molecular tests like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [10]. Besides the most commonly used diagnostic clinical laboratory test methods including Rose Bengal plate agglutination (RBPT), standard tube agglutination test (SAT), coombs antiglobulin test, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; blood culture is recognized as the gold standard test [11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%