2016 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icacsis.2016.7872720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Naive Bayes smoothing methods for Twitter sentiment analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1000 labelled target tweets (containing specific sentiment expressions for interdisciplinarity, multidisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity) were added to training data to subsequently build the classification model. Additionally, to mitigate some risk of misclassification due to the absence of sample features in the training data, we used Laplace smoothing [50]—for the algorithms that allow smoothing. All pre-processing steps described in §2.4 were similarly applied on the training tweets and the target tweets so that the learned features of the training data could be correctly applied to the target tweets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1000 labelled target tweets (containing specific sentiment expressions for interdisciplinarity, multidisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity) were added to training data to subsequently build the classification model. Additionally, to mitigate some risk of misclassification due to the absence of sample features in the training data, we used Laplace smoothing [50]—for the algorithms that allow smoothing. All pre-processing steps described in §2.4 were similarly applied on the training tweets and the target tweets so that the learned features of the training data could be correctly applied to the target tweets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For investigating performance of classification, the number of selected features is varied from 10% to 90%. Then they are investigated to classify opinion orientation by using Naïve Bayes that is a simple classifier and effective in opinion classification [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. 10-fold cross-validation is used to divide dataset the experiments.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluations 41 Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metode smoothing merupakan metode untuk menghindari hasil klasifikasi bernilai 0 dikarenakan data testing tidak ditemukan pada data training. Pada penelitian ini digunakan metode laplace smoothing, yaitu metode smoothing yang paling sederhana karena hanya menambahkan angka 1, tapi metode laplace smoothing memiliki perfomance yang cukup baik dibandingkan dengan metode smoothing lainnya [8], pada penerapan text atau numerik. Salah satunya pada perbandingan smoothing untuk pengkategorian soal ujian [2], sebagai penerapan pada data text (text mining).…”
Section: Peminatan Siswaunclassified