Comparison of New Era’s Education Platforms, YouTube® and WebSurg®, in Sleeve Gastrectomy

Ferhatoğlu, Murat Ferhat; Kartal, Abdülcabbar; Filiz, Ali İlker; Kebudi, Abut

doi:10.1007/s11695-019-04008-x

Cited by 34 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results have been controversial. Various measurement tools have been suggested to evaluate the reliability and quality of consumer medical information, such as DISCERN, Health on the Net code, the Journal of the American Medical Association Score (JAMAS) benchmark criteria, and the global quality score (GQS) [ 10 , 38 - 43 ]. Other studies have compared videos based on their sources (ie, government agencies, news agencies, health care professionals, and independent users) and then on the reliability and quality of these sources.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Korean-Language COVID-19–Related Medical Information on YouTube: Cross-Sectional Infodemiology Study

Moon¹,

Lee²

2020

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background In South Korea, the number of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) cases has declined rapidly and much sooner than in other countries. South Korea is one of the most digitalized countries in the world, and YouTube may have served as a rapid delivery mechanism for increasing public awareness of COVID-19. Thus, the platform may have helped the South Korean public fight the spread of the disease. Objective The aim of this study is to compare the reliability, overall quality, title–content consistency, and content coverage of Korean-language YouTube videos on COVID-19, which have been uploaded by different sources. Methods A total of 200 of the most viewed YouTube videos from January 1, 2020, to April 30, 2020, were screened, searching in Korean for the terms “Coronavirus,” “COVID,” “Corona,” “Wuhan virus,” and “Wuhan pneumonia.” Non-Korean videos and videos that were duplicated, irrelevant, or livestreamed were excluded. Source and video metrics were collected. The videos were scored based on the following criteria: modified DISCERN index, Journal of the American Medical Association Score (JAMAS) benchmark criteria, global quality score (GQS), title–content consistency index (TCCI), and medical information and content index (MICI). Results Of the 105 total videos, 37.14% (39/105) contained misleading information; independent user–generated videos showed the highest proportion of misleading information at 68.09% (32/47), while all of the government-generated videos were useful. Government agency–generated videos achieved the highest median score of DISCERN (5.0, IQR 5.0-5.0), JAMAS (4.0, IQR 4.0-4.0), GQS (4.0, IQR 3.0-4.5), and TCCI (5.0, IQR 5.0-5.0), while independent user–generated videos achieved the lowest median score of DISCERN (2.0, IQR 1.0-3.0), JAMAS (2.0, IQR 1.5-2.0), GQS (2.0, IQR 1.5-2.0), and TCCI (3.0, IQR 3.0-4.0). However, the total MICI was not significantly different among sources. “Transmission and precautionary measures” were the most commonly covered content by government agencies, news agencies, and independent users. In contrast, the most mentioned content by news agencies was “prevalence,” followed by “transmission and precautionary measures.” Conclusions Misleading videos had more likes, fewer comments, and longer running times than useful videos. Korean-language YouTube videos on COVID-19 uploaded by different sources varied significantly in terms of reliability, overall quality, and title–content consistency, but the content coverage was not significantly different. Government-generated videos had higher reliability, overall quality, and title–content consistency than independent user–generated videos.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Korean-Language COVID-19–Related Medical Information on YouTube: Cross-Sectional Infodemiology Study

Moon¹,

Lee²

2020

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Many different video platforms exist, the most used being YouTube, but also specialized surgery-orientated platforms or online medical journal platforms. 4,[10][11][12] Educational surgery videos that are available online are too often of insufficient quality and are rarely peer reviewed. 5,11,[13][14][15][16] Guidelines are available for other specialties, such as general surgery, to help improve the quality of the videos, but none are available in otorhinolaryngology.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…4,[10][11][12] Educational surgery videos that are available online are too often of insufficient quality and are rarely peer reviewed. 5,11,[13][14][15][16] Guidelines are available for other specialties, such as general surgery, to help improve the quality of the videos, but none are available in otorhinolaryngology. 17,18 Our specialty is well suited to the creation of surgical videos, particularly when using endoscopes or microscopes in otology, rhinology, or laryngology, as first-person surgical films are readily available.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

IVORY Guidelines (Instructional Videos in Otorhinolaryngology by YO‐IFOS): A Consensus on Surgical Videos in Ear, Nose, and Throat

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives/Hypothesis: Otolaryngology instructional videos available online are often of poor quality. The objective of this article was to establish international consensus recommendations for the production of educational surgical videos in otolaryngology. Study Design: DELPHI survey. Methods: Twenty-seven international respondents participated in this study from 12 countries. Consensus was reached after three rounds of questionnaires following the Delphi methodology. The proposals having reached the 80% agreement threshold in the third round were retained. Results: The main recommendations are as follows: 1) Ethics: patients must be anonymized and unrecognizable (apart from plastic surgery if necessary). A signed authorization must be obtained if the person is recognizable. 2) Technical aspects: videos should be edited and in high-definition (HD) quality if possible. Narration or subtitles and didactic illustrations are recommended. 3) Case presentation: name of pathology and procedure must be specified; the case should be presented with relevant workup. 4) Surgery: surgical procedures should be divided into several distinct stages and include tips and pitfalls. Pathology should be shown if relevant. Key points should be detailed at the end of the procedure. 5) Organ-specific: type of approach and bilateral audiometry should be specified in otology. Coronal plane computed tomography scans should be shown in endonasal surgery. It is recommended to show pre-and postoperative videos in voice surgery and preoperative drawings and photos of scars in plastic surgery, as well as the ventilation method in airway surgery.

show abstract

“…Several studies have assessed health-related videos on YouTube TM such as oral leukoplakia, Diabetic Foot Care, Botulinum Toxin for Bruxism [11][12][13]. However, given the uncontrollable nature of information sources, there are significant risks associated with poor, incomplete and incorrect health information dissemination [14,15]. Therefore, there is a need for a continuous critical assessment of the quality of YouTube TM health-related videos.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

YouTubeTM as a source of information for Candida auris infection: A systematic review

Huang

Zhang

Xiao

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background : Candida auris is a novel Candida species, and has emerged globally as a multidrug-resistant health care-associated fungal pathogen. YouTube TM (http://www.youtube.com) as the largest free video-sharing website is increasingly used to search health information. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the content, reliability and quality of YouTube™ videos regarding Candida auris infection, and to identify whether it is a useful resource for people. Methods : The YouTube™ was used to search systematically for videos using the keywords: “ Candida auris infection” and “ Candida auris ”. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to select the videos. The videos were reviewed and scored by two independent reviewers and recorded the “title”, “length”, “views”, “comments”, “dislike”, “like”, “posted days” and “category of videos”. The videos were categorized as “poor”, “good” and “excellent” by the score. The DISCERN tool was used to assess the reliability of the YouTube TM videos. Results : Seventy-six videos were included in final analysis in our study. Most videos (59.2%, 55/76) had better quality. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in respect of the number of likes, dislikes, views, comments, percentage positivity, likebility, view rate and viewers' interaction. Length and posted days were significantly associated with the classification. The videos were categorized as “educational video”, “new report”, “personal experience and blog entertainment” and “interview”. Significant differences were found in the source of videos and the characteristics of the individuals appearing in a video between the groups. Conclusion : YouTube TM has striking potential to be an effective user-friendly learning interface for people to obtain information of Candida auris infection.

show abstract

Comparison of New Era’s Education Platforms, YouTube® and WebSurg®, in Sleeve Gastrectomy

Cited by 34 publications

References 26 publications

Evaluation of Korean-Language COVID-19–Related Medical Information on YouTube: Cross-Sectional Infodemiology Study

Evaluation of Korean-Language COVID-19–Related Medical Information on YouTube: Cross-Sectional Infodemiology Study

IVORY Guidelines (Instructional Videos in Otorhinolaryngology by YO‐IFOS): A Consensus on Surgical Videos in Ear, Nose, and Throat

YouTubeTM as a source of information for Candida auris infection: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About