2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of New Visual Disturbances after Superior versus Nasal/Temporal Laser Peripheral Iridotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Conversely, a study by Srinivasan and colleagues randomized both eyes of patients to either superior or temporal/nasal LPI locations and did not find a significant difference in reported new-onset dysphotopsias. 9 Our institutional preference is to place them in the temporal location; however, given the lack of clear evidence, people who implement this curriculum may choose to recommend either location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Conversely, a study by Srinivasan and colleagues randomized both eyes of patients to either superior or temporal/nasal LPI locations and did not find a significant difference in reported new-onset dysphotopsias. 9 Our institutional preference is to place them in the temporal location; however, given the lack of clear evidence, people who implement this curriculum may choose to recommend either location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding influenced many ophthalmic surgeons to switch from superior to temporal placement. More recently, however, a larger study by Srinivasan et al in India (n=559) 17 showed that dysphotopsia incidence was similar regardless of iridotomy location (8.4% for superior versus 9.5% for temporal; p=0.7). This finding may persuade ophthalmic surgeons to revert back to using superior iridotomy for glaucoma treatment, as was their previous practice.…”
Section: Q: How Has Our Understanding Of Glaucoma Advanced In 2017?mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A new randomized clinical trial (RCT) that compared visual disturbances following superior versus nasal/temporal laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) did not find a statistically significant difference between locations . The authors of the study concluded that considerations other than location should be given greater weight when performing an iridotomy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following data from the current RCT were incorporated in the analysis: 24 (8.4%) of the 285 patients undergoing a superior iridotomy and 26 (9.4%) of the 274 patients undergoing a nasal/temporal location developed any new dysphotopsia …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%