2006
DOI: 10.3354/ame042149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of nitrifier activity versus growth in the Scheldt estuary—a turbid, tidal estuary in northern Europe

Abstract: Nitrifier activity and growth were measured in the Scheldt estuary over a salinity gradient. Measurements were made during all 4 seasons using 15 N enriched ammonium and 14 C labeled carbon incorporation. Established conversion ratios are often used to convert the growth of nitrifiers (measured as the incorporation of carbon) to nitrifying activity (i.e. oxidation of ammonium to nitrate). Our study demonstrated that the conversion of growth rates to nitrifying activity induces uncertainty because activity and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To run the model for the years 2001, 2002, and 2004, the upstream advective forcing, the temperature forcing, and the boundary concentrations have been adapted, but no further calibration was involved, making the fits for those years a model validation. Furthermore the model has been independently validated by comparing nitrification rates to field data from the year 2003 (Andersson et al, 2006) realising the objective of creating a tool to examine interannual differences and annual budgets of key chemical species in the Scheldt estuary.…”
Section: Model Performance: Data-model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To run the model for the years 2001, 2002, and 2004, the upstream advective forcing, the temperature forcing, and the boundary concentrations have been adapted, but no further calibration was involved, making the fits for those years a model validation. Furthermore the model has been independently validated by comparing nitrification rates to field data from the year 2003 (Andersson et al, 2006) realising the objective of creating a tool to examine interannual differences and annual budgets of key chemical species in the Scheldt estuary.…”
Section: Model Performance: Data-model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxic mineralisation and denitrification are included as the two pathways of organic matter degradation that are energetically most favourable (Canfield et al, 2005). Nitrification is included in the model since it is one of the most important O 2 consuming processes in the Scheldt estuary (Soetaert and Herman, 1995a;Andersson et al, 2006).…”
Section: Biogeochemical Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of which values are most accurate, the N ox /C fix ratios in Table 1, except those for 21 March, are almost all higher, and in some cases much higher, than typical ratios of 6-19 reported for (enrichment) cultures of nitrifying bacteria (Billen, 1976;Helder and de Vries, 1983;Belser, 1984;Owens, 1986) and 2-30 for nitrifiers in natural waters (Feliatra and Bianchi, 1993;Bianchi et al, 1997;Andersson et al, 2006a). In comparison to these values, some of the N ox /C fix ratios in the present study are very high, suggesting that relatively little DIC was fixed compared to the amount of energy generated by nitrification.…”
Section: Nitrification Rates Versus Growth Of Autotrophic Nitrifiersmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, in the field, including coastal waters, these aspects have been found to be variable (e.g. Billen, 1976;Owens, 1986;Andersson et al, 2006a) and may be biased by heterotrophy amongst nitrifiers (Ward, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation