2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.10.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of non-invasive tests to detect Helicobacter pylori infection in children and adolescents: Results of a multicenter European study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
106
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
106
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[25][26][27] After the children fasted for Ն1 hour, a baseline breath sample was collected in the manufacturer's breath collection bag. The participant then ingested 3 g of Pranactin-Citric (75 mg of 13 C-urea, citric acid, aspartame, and mannitol) reconstituted in 100 mL of bottled water.…”
Section: Detection Of H Pylorimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[25][26][27] After the children fasted for Ն1 hour, a baseline breath sample was collected in the manufacturer's breath collection bag. The participant then ingested 3 g of Pranactin-Citric (75 mg of 13 C-urea, citric acid, aspartame, and mannitol) reconstituted in 100 mL of bottled water.…”
Section: Detection Of H Pylorimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has not been shown to cause false-positive results in pediatric populations as a result of urease-producing oral flora. 27,28 Breath samples were stored at room temperature for 1 to 4 days before being transported to Anchorage for analysis. The urea hydrolysis rate was determined using the UbiT-IR300 mass spectrophotometer (Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UBT requires patient cooperation such as rinsing their mouths with water immediately after ingestion of 13 C-urea to reduce the effect of oral urease producing bacteria. Therefore, it is more difficult to perform UBT in infants and toddler patients, and lower specificity has been obtained in children younger than 6 years old in past studies [18] [24]- [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the test results were expressed on the LCD of the analyzer in a numeric fashion (0: patient not infected, 1: borderline result, or 2: patient infected); these scores corresponded to radioactivity as count per minute (CPM): <25 CPM: patient not infected, 25-50 CPM: borderline result, and >50 CPM: patient infected. We considered grades 0 and 1 as negative results for our study, and only samples with activities that were more than 50 CPM were regarded as positive (11,12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%