1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-3467(97)00142-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of nonlinear optical properties of sulfide glasses in bulk and thin film form

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows obtained ␤ ͑solid circles͒ together with previous results. 5,[7][8][9][10][11]15 Except for the results reported by Fork 7 and Nasyrov, 15 the agreement between the present spectrum and the previous data appears to be satisfactory. The reason why the two results markedly deviate from the present and others is not known.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…Figure 3 shows obtained ␤ ͑solid circles͒ together with previous results. 5,[7][8][9][10][11]15 Except for the results reported by Fork 7 and Nasyrov, 15 the agreement between the present spectrum and the previous data appears to be satisfactory. The reason why the two results markedly deviate from the present and others is not known.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…The optical gap of 2.26 eV is slightly lower than that of 2.35-2.37 eV obtained for thermally evaporated films. 26,27 The band edge shift toward longer wavelengths in laser-deposited films is consistent with the fact that the films have been exposed to scattered laser light during the deposition. The value reported in Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…We have found wavelength-dependent measurements of the nonlinear index, n 2 , for arsenic sulfide from different data sources [150,[165][166][167][168][169][170][171][172][173][174]. As shown in Figure 3, although slightly scattered, these n 2 values in arsenic sulfide are as high as those in silicon and would not be strongly wavelength-dependent beyond 1.55 µm, because it is longer than the half-bandgap wavelength.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%