2012
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.9624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Novel Risk Markers for Improvement in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Intermediate-Risk Individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
623
3
22

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 988 publications
(669 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
21
623
3
22
Order By: Relevance
“…CAC has been shown to be the best predictor of future events in the general population, 13e15 the elderly, 13,17 and in persons with diabetes. 18 It provides more robust risk prediction than carotid IMT, C-reactive protein, ankle-brachial index, and family history of premature heart disease 19 Incorporating CAC into the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) clearly improves risk stratification and discrimination over scores based on chronologic age. 20 CAC has been shown to better identify those asymptomatic individuals who would benefit from statins, 21 aspirin, 22 ACE inhibitors 23 or the polypill 24 than risk calculators or other biomarkers.…”
Section: Evidence Supporting Cac For Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAC has been shown to be the best predictor of future events in the general population, 13e15 the elderly, 13,17 and in persons with diabetes. 18 It provides more robust risk prediction than carotid IMT, C-reactive protein, ankle-brachial index, and family history of premature heart disease 19 Incorporating CAC into the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) clearly improves risk stratification and discrimination over scores based on chronologic age. 20 CAC has been shown to better identify those asymptomatic individuals who would benefit from statins, 21 aspirin, 22 ACE inhibitors 23 or the polypill 24 than risk calculators or other biomarkers.…”
Section: Evidence Supporting Cac For Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an estimated 10-year event risk of 5%-20% based on traditional cardiovascular screening. [46,48,[68][69][70][71][72][73] Two retrospective cohort studies have evaluated CACS in women with a history of hypertensive pregnancy disorders, and both found a positive association between CACS and self-reported hypertension in pregnancy. [74,75] There are no published prospective studies yet to evaluate CACS in previous preeclamptic patients.…”
Section: Coronary Artery Calcium Scorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criqui et al58 reported that the use of the Agatston score in assessing CAC progression is problematic since an increase in CAC could be caused by an increase in volume, an increase in density, or both. So despite the studies suggesting a strong predictive value of CAC for CVD, there has been little rigorous comparison of what specific measure of CAC is most predictive 59. In order to clarify the clinical significance of these factors, Criqui et al58 conducted a multicenter, prospective observational study of the MESA cohort to determine the independent associations of CAC volume and CAC density with incident CVD events.…”
Section: Multimodality Imaging Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%