2016
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2016.04.0130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Nutrient and Metal Loadings with the Application of Swine Manure Slurries and Their Liquid Separates to Soils

Abstract: The accumulation of phosphorus (P) and metals is a serious concern with the continuous application of manure to agricultural soils. Solid-liquid separation of swine slurry is a promising approach to reduce P and metal loadings through application of separated liquid (SL) as a nutrient source. However, little information is available on nutrient and metal loadings with the application of SL compared with unseparated raw manure (RM). We analyzed element concentrations and calculated nutrient and metal loadings f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From 2004 to 2007, the application of slurries increased soil concentrations around 1.3 mg Zn kg −1 soil for every 1 kg Zn ha −1 applied, and 0.4 mg Cu kg −1 soil for every 1 kg Cu ha −1 applied (Tables 2 and 4 ), although the amount (kg ha −1 ) of Cu applied (from 2004 to 2007) was around four times less than that of Zn (Table 2 ). These increases are consistent with the results obtained by Kumaragamage et al ( 2016 ), and the mean concentrations of 79.1 mg Zn kg −1 and 22.6 mg Cu kg −1 obtained in 2007 are within the ranges proposed by Barber ( 1995 ) (10–300 mg kg −1 for Zn and 1–50 mg kg −1 for Cu). The total increases are the result of the adsorption of these elements in soils at high pH into positions from which they are not readily displaceable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…From 2004 to 2007, the application of slurries increased soil concentrations around 1.3 mg Zn kg −1 soil for every 1 kg Zn ha −1 applied, and 0.4 mg Cu kg −1 soil for every 1 kg Cu ha −1 applied (Tables 2 and 4 ), although the amount (kg ha −1 ) of Cu applied (from 2004 to 2007) was around four times less than that of Zn (Table 2 ). These increases are consistent with the results obtained by Kumaragamage et al ( 2016 ), and the mean concentrations of 79.1 mg Zn kg −1 and 22.6 mg Cu kg −1 obtained in 2007 are within the ranges proposed by Barber ( 1995 ) (10–300 mg kg −1 for Zn and 1–50 mg kg −1 for Cu). The total increases are the result of the adsorption of these elements in soils at high pH into positions from which they are not readily displaceable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…They also show that the Centrifuge (+coagulation agent) had the highest reduction of EC. The near-neutral pH (6.7 to 7.2 units) and widely varied EC (4.9-17.0 mS/cm) are also reflected in studies by Kumaragamage et al (2016) [21] and Vanotti et al (2018) [14]. However, the samples that used coagulation agents showed a little increment in pH that because of the chemical compositions of the coagulant agents but stayed near neutral [11,13,20].…”
Section: Changes In Ec and Nacl Contentmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…10,11 In some soil types such an application may result in a reduction in crop yield due to excess PO 4 −P, salinity, and micronutrient accumulation over time. 12,13 Excess nutrients in soils degrade water quality through eutrophication of surface waters via runoff, and leaching into groundwater by nitrification. 14,15 Agricultural wastewater can be treated for nutrient recovery by an aerated fluidized bed reactor (aerated-FBR) method that precipitates PO 4 −P and NH 4 −N as struvite (MgNH 4 PO 4 • 6H 2 O), a viable slow release fertilizer.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, all of their liquid wastes are contained in lagoons or storage/settling tanks, and are commonly discharged to topsoil as fertilizer through spraying. , Wastewater discharged in this manner, as part of a nutrient management plan, has limited benefit as fertilizer because application is imprecise, and the nutrients are not in slow release form . Effluent spraying also results in unnecessary water losses and contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. , In some soil types such an application may result in a reduction in crop yield due to excess PO 4 –P, salinity, and micronutrient accumulation over time. , Excess nutrients in soils degrade water quality through eutrophication of surface waters via runoff, and leaching into groundwater by nitrification. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%