2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10499-023-01087-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of nutritional quality, flesh quality, muscle cellularity, and expression of muscle growth-related genes between wild and recirculating aquaculture system (RAS)-farmed black rockfish (Sebastes schlegelii)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results found that there was a higher muscle fiber density and smaller muscle fiber diameter, as well as greater muscle hardness in the dorsal muscle of the FO, SO and RO trial groups, which is similar to previous results in glass carp [97] and Nile tilapia [96]. In addition, similar to results obtained in striped bass [98], we also found higher hardness and chewiness, higher muscle fiber density and a smaller diameter in the dorsal muscle of the FO, SO and RO groups, which indicates that FO, SO and RO could also improve muscle hardness and chewiness by modulating the muscle fiber density and diameter in largemouth bass (Figure 7) [94,98]. Meanwhile, previous studies have found that glycogen content in muscle was also related to muscle quality [99].…”
Section: Muscle Qualitysupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results found that there was a higher muscle fiber density and smaller muscle fiber diameter, as well as greater muscle hardness in the dorsal muscle of the FO, SO and RO trial groups, which is similar to previous results in glass carp [97] and Nile tilapia [96]. In addition, similar to results obtained in striped bass [98], we also found higher hardness and chewiness, higher muscle fiber density and a smaller diameter in the dorsal muscle of the FO, SO and RO groups, which indicates that FO, SO and RO could also improve muscle hardness and chewiness by modulating the muscle fiber density and diameter in largemouth bass (Figure 7) [94,98]. Meanwhile, previous studies have found that glycogen content in muscle was also related to muscle quality [99].…”
Section: Muscle Qualitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As for lower levels of hardness, firmness and chewiness in the PO and LO groups, this may be due to the decreasing collagen contents mediated by a lower synthesizing ability [ 90 ]. In addition, previous studies have also found that there is a negative correlation between protease activity and hardness and springiness in muscle [ 94 ]. In general, lower protease activities could decelerate tissue protein hydrolysis and therefore increase muscle hardness and springiness [ 95 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It has been reported that a higher content of SFAs than unsaturated fatty acids in muscle increases muscle hardness [65]. In addition, the textural properties are affected by the crude lipid content of muscle; for example, muscle hardness tends to increase when the muscle lipid content is low [66]. In this study, muscle tenderness and crude lipid content showed significant reductions when 75% of the dietary FM was replaced by NGCP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…This species is preferred due to its tasty flesh and high nutritional and medicinal value. However, recently, a few studies have reported on the flesh quality of wild and cultured fish of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar [ 11 ], sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax [ 9 ], Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus [ 12 ], Coilia nasus Engraulidae [ 13 ], blackspot seabream Pagellus bogaraveo [ 14 ], large yellow croaker Larimichthys crocea [ 15 ], and black rockfish Sebastes schlegelii [ 16 ]; the studies mainly focused on muscle nutritional composition and textural properties, while information on molecular biology was poorly investigated. Muscle quality is a comprehensive characteristic system which is difficult to evaluate in terms of only a few biochemical parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%