2000
DOI: 10.1117/12.388959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of OPC rules and common process windows for 130-nm features using binary and attenuated phase-shift masks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These rules are generated by laboriously examining a multitude of features (under a wide range of OPC conditions), then manually choosing the assist feature and fme bias configuration which minimizes the CD offset between pitches and maximizes the common process window. 5 To complicate these rules further, they are a strong function of illumination condition6 and substrate reflectivity, so potentially a different set of rules is required for each critical process layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These rules are generated by laboriously examining a multitude of features (under a wide range of OPC conditions), then manually choosing the assist feature and fme bias configuration which minimizes the CD offset between pitches and maximizes the common process window. 5 To complicate these rules further, they are a strong function of illumination condition6 and substrate reflectivity, so potentially a different set of rules is required for each critical process layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, the large bias that resulted from using aggressive off-axis illumination (OAI) presents a dilemma for two lithography options. The first is for users of model based OPC who require a mechanism for lowering the cost of ownership of masks with assist features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%