2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2009.00691.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of orbital prosthesis motility following enucleation or evisceration with sclerotomy with or without a motility coupling post in dogs

Abstract: MCP placement in silicone orbital implants significantly enhanced the prosthetic motility in dogs. This study supports the use of MCP in silicone orbital implants to enhance corneoscleral prosthesis motility and cosmetics in dogs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The dense, inflammation‐free fibrous membrane is likely a response to the inert, nontoxic silicone prosthetic implant . This same reaction has been reported to occur on the surfaces in contact with the silicone implant in enucleated and eviscerated eyes of dogs …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The dense, inflammation‐free fibrous membrane is likely a response to the inert, nontoxic silicone prosthetic implant . This same reaction has been reported to occur on the surfaces in contact with the silicone implant in enucleated and eviscerated eyes of dogs …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Inserting an ISP after evisceration has cosmetically acceptable results; however, it has some limitations. This method cannot be used in patients with corneal problems or severe ocular atrophy [6]. Moreover, corneal opacity, vascularization, fibrosis, and pigmentation may be induced after surgery [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motility of an intraocular prosthesis together with the extraocular prosthesis can be further increased by addressing a motility coupling system, like a peg, between the two prostheses [10,23]. This improvement is reported to be relatively small in effect and neutralized by the need of a second anesthesia or sedation and increased rate of complications like persistent discharge, pain, and peg extrusion [9,10,24,25].…”
Section: Prosthesis Motilitymentioning
confidence: 99%