AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2012
DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-5035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Orion Vision Navigation Sensor Performance from STS-134 and the Space Operations Simulation Center

Abstract: The Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle is a new spacecraft being designed by NASA and Lockheed Martin for future crewed exploration missions. The Vision Navigation Sensor is a Flash LIDAR that will be the primary relative navigation sensor for this vehicle. To obtain a better understanding of this sensor's performance, the Orion relative navigation team has performed both flight tests and ground tests. This paper summarizes and compares the performance results from the STS-134 flight test, called the Sensor Test… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed retroreflector locations are then compared to an onboard catalog to generate a 6-DOF pose measurement. 9 The VNS manufacturer optimized the VNS design to work in this cooperative environment which is significantly different than the non-cooperative, feature-tracking environment. One benefit of the synthetic imagery tool described above is that, for specified FPose performance goal, it can generate hard requirements on image data statistics that can be easily tested against for any future LIDAR provider.…”
Section: Fpose Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed retroreflector locations are then compared to an onboard catalog to generate a 6-DOF pose measurement. 9 The VNS manufacturer optimized the VNS design to work in this cooperative environment which is significantly different than the non-cooperative, feature-tracking environment. One benefit of the synthetic imagery tool described above is that, for specified FPose performance goal, it can generate hard requirements on image data statistics that can be easily tested against for any future LIDAR provider.…”
Section: Fpose Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, hardware-based tests are ill-suited for supporting large statistical analyses of algorithm performance, such as in Monte Carlo analyses [13]. Fifth, and finally, some scenarios are extremely difficult to test in the laboratory environment-especially those involving space applications where the scale, lighting, dynamics, and scene surroundings are challenging (and expensive) to accurately emulate on Earth [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%