2011
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e31822aa8ea
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy in Management of Uncomplicated and Complicated Appendicitis

Abstract: Laparoscopic appendectomy is superior or comparable to open appendectomy in terms of several surgical outcome measures for both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis, across most illness severity groups. Thus, laparoscopic appendectomy may be the preferred technique, irrespective of appendicitis diagnosis or disease severity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
110
3
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
14
110
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[23][24][25][26][27][28] Condition-specific outcomes were as follows: receipt of cholecystectomy when admitted with acute cholecystitis; receipt of minimally-invasive appendectomy or cholecystectomy when undergoing surgery for acute appendicitis or cholecystitis; and avoidance of amputation when admitted with lower extremity peripheral artery disease. While alternative treatment may be appropriate for individual patients depending on specific presentation, we contend that receipt of optimal care as defined here represents the ideal management if patients present early and are healthy enough to receive it.…”
Section: Data Source and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25][26][27][28] Condition-specific outcomes were as follows: receipt of cholecystectomy when admitted with acute cholecystitis; receipt of minimally-invasive appendectomy or cholecystectomy when undergoing surgery for acute appendicitis or cholecystitis; and avoidance of amputation when admitted with lower extremity peripheral artery disease. While alternative treatment may be appropriate for individual patients depending on specific presentation, we contend that receipt of optimal care as defined here represents the ideal management if patients present early and are healthy enough to receive it.…”
Section: Data Source and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average length of stay was about 8 days with a complication rate of just under 20 %. If we fast-forward to the 2011 report in The Annals of Surgery by SAGES member Dimtri Oleynikov, we see that the superiority of laparoscopic appendectomy is demonstrated for simple and complicated appendicitis in a review of 40,000 patients [4]. Uncomplicated appendicitis is now an outpatient procedure, whereas the length of stay in this series for complicated appendicitis was 4 days when performed laparoscopically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Mnenja glede uporabe laparoskopske tehnike pri zapletenih vnetjih so različna, saj nekateri poročajo o višjem odstotku konverzij, daljšem času operacije, večji pojavnosti abscesov in daljši hospitalizaciji (3); drugi ugotavljajo ugoden potek LA tudi pri zapletenem apendicitisu (4,5). V Splošni bolnišnici Izola (SBI) je laparoskopska apendektomija metoda izbire pri zdravljenju akutnega vnetja slepiča, tako enostavnega kot zapletenega.…”
Section: Uvodunclassified
“…30 T. Jakomin, J. Gorjanc, J. Grosek). Velike svetovne statistike v zadnjih letih poročajo o bistveno ugodnejšem poteku in rezultatih LA tudi pri zapletenem apendicitisu (4,5). Na 13. slovenskem endoskopskem kongresu v Mariboru 2015 pa kolegi s Ptuja že poročajo o prevladujočem številu LA nad klasično apendektomijo (24).…”
Section: Razpravljanjeunclassified