Comparison of Overfeeding Influence on Slaughter Performance, Small Intestinal Physiology and Microbiota between Gang Goose and Tianfu Meat Goose

Wei, Rongxue; Ye, Fengjiang; He, Fang; Song, Qi; Xiong, Xiangping; Yang, Wenlan; Xu, Hao; Li, Liang; Liu, Hehe; Zeng, Xianyin; Chen, Ling; Han, Chunchun

doi:10.36380/jwpr.2020.40

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hence, the provision of excess amino acids may unnecessarily improve duck's metabolism and productivity. Moreover, extra feeding may instead result in lipid buildup inside cutaneous and liver tissue (Wei et al, 2020). Besides, intestinal bacteria may also offer several types of amino acids, both essential and non-essential (Apajalahti and Vienola, 2016).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The intestinal tract of ducks provides an ideal site for bacterial colonization that can mutually influence the host's anatomy and physiology (Wang et al, 2018). The presence of gut bacteria positively involves intestinal development and increases the ability to absorb feed nutrients (Wei et al, 2020). Variations in additional feed, such as shrimp carapace and plant fiber (in this study is water spinach), affect the intestine's physiology and bacteria composition (Cao et al, 2020).…”

Section: Diversity Of Duck Intestinal Duct Metagenomementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The interaction of intestinal bacteria and feed: a case study of intensive-duck husbandry in Central Java

Susanti

Dafip

Christijanti

et al. 2021

J. Indonesian Trop. Anim. Agric.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was aimed to compare sugars and amino acid content in duck’s feed and the intestinal bacteria's effects to improve ducks' quality. This research was an observational exploration involving five duck husbandries from Semarang, Temanggung, Magelang, Pati, and Salatiga District, Central Java. A total of 5 g of intestinal contents were collected from each of the five ducks randomly selected from each husbandry. The feed and intestinal contents were then analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The highest amino acid types were glutamate, aspartate, lysine, valine, and isoleucine, while the lowest was asparagine found in all sample farms. Intestinal contents freshly extracted then placed in dark bottles sterile for microbiome analysis with primers 6S rRNA V3-V4 genome identification. The concentration of glucose, fructose, and galactose in the intestine has increased significantly caused by digested polysaccharides. The composition of bacteria plays a vital role in digesting polysaccharides, makes them quickly absorbed by duck’s intestine cells. The abundance of bacteria in all sample locations was dominated by the phylum Firmicutes, especially Lactobacilalles, Bacilalles, and Clostridialles. Over feeding may not effective in sugar and essential amino acid absorption, however, it may play an essential role in the diversity of gut bacteria to produce necessary component for duck’s physiology.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Diversity Of Duck Intestinal Duct Metagenomementioning

confidence: 99%

The interaction of intestinal bacteria and feed: a case study of intensive-duck husbandry in Central Java

Susanti

Dafip

Christijanti

et al. 2021

J. Indonesian Trop. Anim. Agric.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…That feed composition produces high monosaccharide content (Table 2). Overfeeding practice increases high monosaccharides consumption that triggers dysbiosis and metabolic inflammation in the intestinal organs (Wei et al 2020). In addition, it starts glucotoxicity and increases intestinal cell permeability, and loosens junctions, which results in intestinal cell necrosis (Chakaroun et al 2020;Filippello et al 2021).…”

Section: Metagenomic Microbiota In the Small And Large Intestinementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Previous research demonstrates that unique bacteria community structures characterize the gut microbiome in different duck species that could manage and contributes to the duck's growth (Liu et al 2018;Wei et al 2020). The gut microbiome mainly conducts a vital physiological function in the small and large intestines (Zhu et al 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, IgA can be secreted and activated during a steady-state (undisturbed; healthy) or intestinal infection condition. Furthermore, the abundance and diversity of the intestinal microbiome are affected mainly by feed composition and nutrition intake; then, it automatically modulates the host's immune quality in the intestines (Schofield and Palm 2018;Wei et al 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Characterization of microbiota and secretory Ig-A in the domestic duck (Anas platyrhynchos) small and large intestine

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Susanti R, Utami NR, Yuniastuti A. 2023. Characterization of microbiota and secretory Ig-A in the domestic duck (Anas platyrhynchos)small and large intestine. Biodiversitas 24: 2458-2466. The Microbiome composition could affect the duck's intestines' microenvironment, which may shape the microstructure's anatomy, metabolism, and immune system. Therefore, this study aims to characterize the intestinal microbiome's abundance, diversity, and IgA distribution in ducks' intestines. This study took 15 healthy domestic ducks (Anas platyrhynchosLinnaeus, 1758) from an intensive duck farm in Central Java, Indonesia. Five grams of each small and large intestine content were collected aseptically for metagenomic analysis. Then, the intestine organs were taken for immunohistochemistry preparations to depict the IgA distribution. The results showed that the small intestine has a greater bacterial abundance community, with 18 phyla, while only 13 are found in the large intestine. Interestingly, three phyla: Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes, were found dominantly in both organs. However, the comparison of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes ratio was higher in the small intestine (2357.76) than large intestine (10.64). The IgA distribution in the small and large intestines showed intermediate staining intensity (score: 2.07-2.20) and a final Allred score of 5.0 (positive). Even though dysbiosis microbiome was present in intestines with dominant species Streptococcus and Enterococcus, it seems no significant IgA over secretion. Understanding duck's gut immune response is important because it is highly tolerant to the pathogens that make them play an important role as an environmental reservoir for pathogenic viruses and bacteria and may potentially comprehend future infectious disease outbreaks.

show abstract

Comparison of Overfeeding Influence on Slaughter Performance, Small Intestinal Physiology and Microbiota between Gang Goose and Tianfu Meat Goose

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

The interaction of intestinal bacteria and feed: a case study of intensive-duck husbandry in Central Java

The interaction of intestinal bacteria and feed: a case study of intensive-duck husbandry in Central Java

Characterization of microbiota and secretory Ig-A in the domestic duck (Anas platyrhynchos) small and large intestine

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About