1994
DOI: 10.1049/ip-rsn:19949885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of parameter estimators for K-distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, in the context of electromagnetic scattering by a random medium (Blacknell, 1994;Jakeman, 1987) it has been shown to be an approximation of a K distribution (see Table 3). Actually, for a given Weibull-distributed random variable with parameters a and b it is straightforward to ®nd the closest K distribution with parameters a H and b H by just equating their ®rst and second moments l and r…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in the context of electromagnetic scattering by a random medium (Blacknell, 1994;Jakeman, 1987) it has been shown to be an approximation of a K distribution (see Table 3). Actually, for a given Weibull-distributed random variable with parameters a and b it is straightforward to ®nd the closest K distribution with parameters a H and b H by just equating their ®rst and second moments l and r…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods for estimating the K distribution parameters have been proposed in the literature [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. In [31], a comparison of four different methods was performed, concluding that the MoM based on second and fourth moments [32] displays the best results.…”
Section: B Methods For Obtaining K Shape Parameter Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will write µ and σ 2 to denote the intrinsic (unknown) mean and variance of the amplitudes of K distributed clutter, while for their estimates based on pixel (amplitude) values x, we will use M = <x> and S 2 = <(x − M) 2 >. From µ (estimated by M), σ (estimated by S) and L (provided), ν can be derived from theoretical relations (e.g., [70]). …”
Section: Threshold Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%