2015
DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s85711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of paroxetine and agomelatine in depressed type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial

Abstract: BackgroundComorbid depression/anxiety in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients is highly prevalent, affecting both diabetes control and quality of life. However, the best treating method for depression/anxiety in type 2 DM patients is still unclear. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of paroxetine and agomelatine on depression/anxiety and metabolic control of type 2 DM patients.MethodsA total of 116 depressed, type 2 DM patients were recruited for 12 weeks treatment. Patients were randomly assig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a randomized trial reported that agomelatine had some advantages over paroxetine in treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. 14 Considering the high prevalence of CKD in diabetes patients, 15 we hypothesize that agomelatine could be more effective than paroxetine in treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in CKD patients. Therefore, we conducted this randomized trial to validate this assumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a randomized trial reported that agomelatine had some advantages over paroxetine in treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. 14 Considering the high prevalence of CKD in diabetes patients, 15 we hypothesize that agomelatine could be more effective than paroxetine in treating depressive and anxiety symptoms in CKD patients. Therefore, we conducted this randomized trial to validate this assumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was conducted between January 2015 and June 2017 in Chongqing Public Health Medical Center. T2DM subjects meeting the following criteria were recruited by two experienced clinicians: 1) a value of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >7.0%; 2) a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) score ≧17 and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) score >7; 19 , 20 3) 18–80 years of age; 4) in order to exclude T2DM subjects with cognitive impairment, the Mini Mental State Examination score of each subject should be more than 24; and 5) without active suicidal ideation, a history of any other psychiatric disorders, and serious mental illness or physical health problems. Meanwhile, T2DM subjects were excluded if they previously or currently received psychoactive medications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of covarying out the effect of initial values, the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to examine the effect of the two intervention methods on the MMSE, ADL, and CDR scores at the last assessment. 24 Also, subgroup analysis was conducted according to the severity of dementia, age, and sex. All tests were two-sided, and p <0.05 was considered significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%