2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65791-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of phosphor screen autoradiography and micro-pattern gas detector based autoradiography for the porosity of altered rocks

Abstract: this study aims to further develop the 14 c-pMMA porosity calculation method with a novel autoradiography technique, the Micro-pattern gas detector autoradiography (MpGDA). in this study, the MpGDA is compared with phosphor screen autoradiography (SpA). A set of rock samples from Martinique island exhibiting a large range of connected porosities was used to validate the MpGDA method. calculated porosities were found to be in agreement with ones from the SpA and the tripleweight method (TW). The filmless nature… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values could then be cross-referenced to other studies (e.g., efficiency for carbon-14 = 36% and efficiency for barium-133 = 82.1%) to evaluate the validity of this method. 35,38 Our study also evaluated the critical level L C , detection limit N D , and minimum detectable activity MDA per unit area for the detection of radio-Cs using the BeaQuant system. The blank sample was used to acquire the background counts from the detector.…”
Section: Detection Efficiency and Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These values could then be cross-referenced to other studies (e.g., efficiency for carbon-14 = 36% and efficiency for barium-133 = 82.1%) to evaluate the validity of this method. 35,38 Our study also evaluated the critical level L C , detection limit N D , and minimum detectable activity MDA per unit area for the detection of radio-Cs using the BeaQuant system. The blank sample was used to acquire the background counts from the detector.…”
Section: Detection Efficiency and Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such techniques, the autoradiograph can be immediately seen during the measurement and the sample’s radioactivity can be gauged without stopping the acquisition. In contrast to phosphor screen autoradiography, which provides an image that is indirectly measured by the photo-stimulated luminescence of the imaging plate, real-time autoradiographs construct the image by directly measuring the individual decay emitted from the sample . Due to the low density and thickness of the active gas media, MPGDs are largely insensitive to γ radiation at room temperature and atmospheric pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify the connected porosity of the rock at different stage of weathering with a spatial resolution of ~20 µm, the samples were impregnated with the 14 C-MethylMethAcrylate (MMA) liquid monomer (Siitari-Kauppi, 2002;Oila et al, 2005;Sardini et al, 2006Sardini et al, , 2009Mazurier et al, 2016;Bonnet et al, 2020;Delayre et al, 2020). The unweathered rock (GRV01), saprock (GRV03, GRV04) and saprolite (VIA03) samples were dried in a vacuum in an oven set at 50 • C for 11 days to remove all residual water before impregnation.…”
Section: Porosity Characterisation Using 14 C-pmma (Polymethylmethacr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the activities are converted into porosities by taking into account the beta attenuation and the true density of the samples (measured by helium pycnometry) [57]. Several PMMA standards of known C-14 activities are needed to convert the grey values of each pixel into porosity values [57][58][59][60]. The uncertainty of the C-14-PMMA autoradiography has been empirically determined to be approximately 10% [57].…”
Section: Microstructure Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%