2009
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.109.874057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Plaque Sealing With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents Versus Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Moderate Nonsignificant Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions

Abstract: Background-The presence of moderate saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions is a major predictor of cardiac events late after coronary artery bypass grafting. We determined the effects of sealing moderate nonsignificant SVG lesions with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) on the prevention of SVG atherosclerosis progression. Methods and Results-Patients with at least 1 moderate SVG lesion (30% to 60% diameter stenosis) were randomized either to stenting the moderate SVG lesion with a PES (nϭ30, PES group) or to medical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the higher cardiac death and MI rate in the SVG group was neither driven by ST nor accelerated by restenosis rate, thus implying an appropriate safety and efficacy profile for the Nobori stent even in this complex lesion and patient subset. Consequently, this stent may also be appropriate for plaque sealing of SVG lesions, a procedure which is suggested to prevent future adverse events in patients with moderate, hemodynamically nonsignificant bypass lesions compared to medical therapy alone …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the higher cardiac death and MI rate in the SVG group was neither driven by ST nor accelerated by restenosis rate, thus implying an appropriate safety and efficacy profile for the Nobori stent even in this complex lesion and patient subset. Consequently, this stent may also be appropriate for plaque sealing of SVG lesions, a procedure which is suggested to prevent future adverse events in patients with moderate, hemodynamically nonsignificant bypass lesions compared to medical therapy alone …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVG interventions currently account for about 5–10% of total percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) annually in the United States [1], [2]. This number is likely to increase in the near future since there is emerging evidence that even lower degree stenoses (30–60%) may profit from stent implantations;[3] very much in contrast to stenoses in native vessels where increasing data suggest that only hemodynamically significant higher degree stenoses should be treated [4]. The natural and post-interventional biological behaviour of saphenous vein grafts clearly differs from native vessels, they are at higher risk for restenosis [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The moderate VEin graft LEsion stenting with the Taxus stent and Intravascular ultrasound (VELE-TI) çalışmasında [33] yalnızca tıpsal tedavi edilenlerle karşılaştırıldığında İSS ile tedavi edilen orta derecede darlığı olan SVG lezyonlarında daha iyi lümen alanı sağlanmış ve 1 ve 3 yıllık MACE sıklığı daha düşük bulunmuştur.…”
Section: The Reduction In Re-stenosis In Saphenous Veinunclassified