2018
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-551-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Point Cloud Registration Algorithms for Better Result Assessment – Towards an Open-Source Solution

Abstract: Terrestrial and airborne laser scanning, photogrammetry and more generally 3D recording techniques are used in a wide range of applications. After recording several individual 3D datasets known in local systems, one of the first crucial processing steps is the registration of these data into a common reference frame. To perform such a 3D transformation, commercial and open source software as well as programs from the academic community are available. Due to some lacks in terms of computation transparency and q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of Samaipata rock, the main obstacle and difference between similar studies of deformation measurement [9], [10], [2] based on repeated TLS is the considerable disparity in the parameters of the two different instruments used for the scanning -the ILRIS-3D laser scanner produced by Optech in 2006 and the ScanStation P40 introduced by Leica Geosystems in 2016. Both scanners belong to two entirely different epochs of TLS technology development; therefore, their technical characteristics differ considerably.…”
Section: Określanie Stopnia Erozji I Tempa Rozprzestrzeniania Się Pormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of Samaipata rock, the main obstacle and difference between similar studies of deformation measurement [9], [10], [2] based on repeated TLS is the considerable disparity in the parameters of the two different instruments used for the scanning -the ILRIS-3D laser scanner produced by Optech in 2006 and the ScanStation P40 introduced by Leica Geosystems in 2016. Both scanners belong to two entirely different epochs of TLS technology development; therefore, their technical characteristics differ considerably.…”
Section: Określanie Stopnia Erozji I Tempa Rozprzestrzeniania Się Pormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proper preservation requires reliable tools that offer accurate diagnostics of current conditions of the site. The latest advances in surveying technology, particularly that of 3D terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), give the opportunity to study damage and material decay using analysis of 3D point clouds generated by different instruments and techniques [2], [3]. Among them, TLS data are widely and successfully used for structural health monitoring in both civil engineering [4] and cultural heritage [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the accidental errors, which can be as large as 15.58 cm is also spotted, meaning there are still room for improvements in the future. Table 3 shows the detailed numerical statistics of the comparison [88][89][90][91][92]. The accuracy of the recovered trajectory is not considered as the assessment criterion, since the point distribution versus the TLS point cloud, the noise level of the point cloud produced, and the accuracy of the targets is capable of reflecting the accuracy level of the system, which is also the main requirement of applying such mobile mapping system.…”
Section: Plane-to-plane Alignments For Imu-free Mobile Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using as comparison parameter the scan rate of Time of Flight (ToF) devices produced for example by Trimble, the point per second rate has improved exponentially from 5000 points/second (Trimble GX) in 2005 [6] to 25,000 points/second (Trimble SX10) in 2017 [7] and 100,000 points/second (Trimble X7) in 2020 (https://geospatialx7.trimble.com, retrieved 22 January 2020). This is also supported by significant improvements in the software part, with workflow automation taking more and more importance aided by ever more powerful computing cores available for the user [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%