2003
DOI: 10.2460/javma.2003.222.1230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of polymerase chain reaction assay, bacteriologic culture, and serologic testing in assessment of prevalence of urinary shedding of leptospires in dogs

Abstract: Irrespective of health status, 8.2% of dogs were shedding pathogenic leptospires. Serologic testing was a poor predictor of urinary shedding. Clinically normal dogs that shed leptospires may pose a zoonotic risk to their owners.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

10
86
2
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
10
86
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…2) demonstrated that out of 89 seropositive cows, 23 responded positively in PCR, whereas Leptospira were found only in 11 urine samples. Similar studies were conducted by many researchers (20), who observed negative reaction in bacteriological studies, but positive in 50% cases using PCR (13). In the studies of these authors, PCR demonstrated very good results as compared to traditional methods, which was also confirmed in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…2) demonstrated that out of 89 seropositive cows, 23 responded positively in PCR, whereas Leptospira were found only in 11 urine samples. Similar studies were conducted by many researchers (20), who observed negative reaction in bacteriological studies, but positive in 50% cases using PCR (13). In the studies of these authors, PCR demonstrated very good results as compared to traditional methods, which was also confirmed in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…There were variations in the sensitivity and specificity in detecting leptospiral organisms by various PCR methods (Wagenaar et al 2000). In addition, some PCR methods exhibited false positives in detecting pathogenic leptospires in clinical samples which crossreacted with saprophytic leptospires (Merien et al 1992;Wagenaar et al 1994;Harkin et al 2003). Selection of PCR methods is highly critical for the detection of leptospires in various samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonspecific vaccine titers can be detected by a microscopic agglutination test (MAT) up to three months after immunization (MILLER et al, 2011). Harkin et al (2003) and Minke et al (2009) showed that the vaccines prevent renal colonization, leptospiruria over long periods and death after extreme challenges in experimental infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%