2019
DOI: 10.1177/0898264318824180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Population Aging in Europe and Asia Using a Time-Consistent and Comparative Aging Measure

Abstract: Objective: We compare population aging in Europe and Asia using a measure that is both consistent over time and appropriate for cross-country comparison. Method: Sanderson and Scherbov proposed to estimate the old-age threshold by the age at which the remaining life expectancy (RLE) equals 15 years. We propose an adjustment of this measure, taking into account cross-national differences in the exceptionality of reaching that age. Results: Our old-age threshold was lower than 65 years in 2012 in Central Asia, S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How RLE15-and TTD<5 are calculated is explained in detail in, respectively, Sanderson and Scherbov [7] and Riffe and Brouard [22]. We do not consider Balachandran et al [8] adjustment of adult survival until the old-age threshold when calculating RLE15 because their time trend observations revealed virtually no difference to Sanderson and Scherbov's [7] RLE15 method.…”
Section: Alternative Elderly Dependency Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…How RLE15-and TTD<5 are calculated is explained in detail in, respectively, Sanderson and Scherbov [7] and Riffe and Brouard [22]. We do not consider Balachandran et al [8] adjustment of adult survival until the old-age threshold when calculating RLE15 because their time trend observations revealed virtually no difference to Sanderson and Scherbov's [7] RLE15 method.…”
Section: Alternative Elderly Dependency Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sanderson and Scherbov [7] devised the so-called prospective age approach in which the oldage threshold is based on the age at which the expected remaining life expectancy (RLE) equals 15 years (henceforth abbreviated as RLE15). Balachandran et al [8] further adjusted this measure to account for cross-country differences in the "exceptionality" of reaching RLE 15 by considering the adult survival ratio in benchmark country Japan when calculating the share of elderly, while Spijker and MacInnes [9] argued that only those in paid employment rather than everyone of "working age" (however defined) should be considered the population who pays for elderly health and wellbeing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most countries the number of elderly persons and their percentage has been exponentially growing over the last few decades, and these trends are expected to accelerate in the coming ones. Population ageing will probably become the most important social change of this century (Balachandran, de Beer, James, van Wissen, and Janssen 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the measure was successful in capturing the improvements in life expectancy across populations, it has limitations: (a) it wrongly assumes that the changes in life expectancy capture the changes in multiple dimensions of health and (b) it is based on the conditions in developed countries of the world. Setting the old-age threshold with a remaining life expectancy of 15 years was based on the experience of Europe, where the remaining life expectancy at age 65 in 1980 was indeed 15 years (Balachandran et al , in press). From this we can see that the existing measures of population ageing that try to capture multi-dimensional changes among older adults are either based on an abstract definition of old age as the population above age 60 or 65, or are based on the ideals from the developed world on what constitutes wellbeing, or sometimes both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure also takes a ‘progressive’ approach to measuring ageing, as proposed by Sanderson and Scherbov (2005, 2013). But it represents an improvement over the existing applications (Sanderson et al , 2016; Balachandran et al , 2017, in press) as it is sensitive to the conditions in developing countries. The methodology generates a multi-dimensional old-age threshold (MOAT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%