2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of porcelain bond strength of different metal frameworks prepared by using conventional and recently introduced fabrication methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
2
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Kaleli and Sarac [69] compared porcelain bond strength of Co-Cr frameworks manufactured by conventional lost-wax technique, milling, direct metal laser sintering (DMLS), and direct process powder-bed method. There was no signiicant diference between the values of porcelain bond strength to the samples, produced by diferent methods.…”
Section: Properties Of Co-cr Dental Alloys Fabricated Via Slmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaleli and Sarac [69] compared porcelain bond strength of Co-Cr frameworks manufactured by conventional lost-wax technique, milling, direct metal laser sintering (DMLS), and direct process powder-bed method. There was no signiicant diference between the values of porcelain bond strength to the samples, produced by diferent methods.…”
Section: Properties Of Co-cr Dental Alloys Fabricated Via Slmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cracks mainly occur at the metal-ceramic interface or within the veneering porcelain (Daftary 1986) and (Zhukovsky 1996). Factors such as trauma, fatigue, occlusal loads and incompatibility between the mechanical properties of metal and porcelain may result in porcelain fracture especially of cohesive type (Pameijer 1996and Kelsey 2000,Ren 2016and Kaleli 2017. Metal-ceramic frameworks are conventionally fabricated using the lost wax casting (Anusavice 2003) and (Kaleli 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ren et al [20] and Li et al [21] reported a favorable porcelain adherence of SLM-produced alloys in comparison with cast alloys. Recently, Kaleli et al [22] demonstrated that Co-Cr dental alloy fabricated via SLM had significantly higher bond strength than cast alloy. In metal-ceramic restorations, another frequent reason for porcelain fracture is the lack of rigidity and the distortion of the metal substructure [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%