PURPOSEA recently introduced direct drill-guiding implant surgery system features minimal tolerance of surgical instruments in the metal sleeve by using shank-modified drills and a sleeve-incorporated stereolithographic guide template. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of this new guided surgery system in partially edentulous patients using geometric analyses.MATERIALS AND METHODSFor the study, 21 implants were placed in 11 consecutive patients using the direct drill-guiding implant surgery system. The stereolithographic surgical guide was fabricated using cone-beam computed tomography, digital scanning, computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing, and additive manufacturing processes. After surgery, the positional and angular deviations between planned and placed implants were measured at the abutment level using implant-planning software. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the deviations (α=.05).RESULTSThe mean horizontal deviations were 0.593 mm (SD 0.238) mesiodistally and 0.691 mm (SD 0.344) buccolingually. The mean vertical deviation was 0.925 mm (SD 0.376) occlusogingivally. The vertical deviation was significantly larger than the horizontal deviation (P=.018). The mean angular deviation was 2.024 degrees (SD 0.942) mesiodistally and 2.390 degrees (SD 1.142) buccolingually.CONCLUSIONThe direct drill-guiding implant surgery system demonstrates high accuracy in placing implants. Use of the drill shank as the guiding component is an effective way for reducing tolerance.
Three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies have been widely used to manufacture crowns and frameworks for fixed dental prostheses. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the reliability of the marginal fit of 3D-printed cobalt-chromium-based fixed dental prostheses in comparison to conventional casting methods. Articles published until 25 June 2020, reporting the marginal fit of fixed prostheses fabricated with metal 3D printing, were searched using electronic literature databases. After the screening and quality assessment, 21 eligible peer-reviewed articles were selected. Meta-analysis revealed that the marginal gap of the prostheses manufactured using 3D printing was significantly smaller compared to that manufactured using casting methods (standard mean difference (95% CI): −0.92 (−1.45, −0.38); Z = −3.37; p = 0.0008). The estimated difference between the single and multi-unit types did not differ significantly (p = 0.3573). In the subgroup analysis for the measurement methods, the tendency of marginal discrepancy between the 3D printing and casting groups was significantly different between articles that used direct observation and those that used the silicone replica technique (p < 0.001). Metal 3D printing technologies appear reliable as an alternative to casting methods in terms of the fit of the fixed dental prostheses. In order to analyze the factors influencing manufacturing and confirm the results of this review, further controlled laboratory and clinical studies are required.
Selective laser melting (SLM), used to fabricate metallic objects with high geometrical complexity, is currently of increasing interest to the fields of medicine and dentistry. SLM-fabricated products should have highly smooth surfaces to minimize the use of post-processing procedures such as finishing and polishing. This study investigated the effect of various laser process parameters (laser power, scan rate, and scan-line spacing) on the surface roughness of a Co-Cr dental alloy that was three-dimensionally (3D) constructed via SLM. Initially, a single-line formation test was used to determine the optimal laser power (200 W) and scan rate (128.6 mm/s) that resulted in beads with an optimal profile. During subsequent multi-layer formation tests, the 3D Co-Cr body with the smoothest surface was produced using a scan-line spacing of 100 µm. The findings of this study show that laser process parameters have crucial effects on the surface quality of SLM-fabricated Co-Cr dental alloys.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to measure the muscle activities of the trunk
muscles and upper limb muscles during maximum isometric contraction when temporomandibular
joint alignment was achieved with a mandibular orthopedic repositioning appliance in order
provide basic data on the effects of mandibular orthopedic repositioning appliance on the
entire body. [Subjects] The present study was conducted with healthy Korean adults in
their 20s (males=10, females=10). [Methods] An 8 channel surface electromyography system
was used to measure the muscle activities of the upper limb muscles and neck muscles of
the subjects during maximum isometric contraction with and without use of a mandibular
orthopedic repositioning appliance. [Results] The maximum isometric contractions of the
trunk and upper limb muscles when mandibular orthopedic repositioning appliance were used
were compared with those when no mandibular orthopedic repositioning appliance was used.
The results showed that the sternocleidomastoid muscle, cervical and lumbar erector
spinae, upper trapezius, biceps, triceps, rectus abdominis and internal oblique and
external oblique muscles all showed significant increases in maximum isometric
contractions with a mandibular orthopedic repositioning appliance. [Conclusion] The use of
a mandibular orthopedic repositioning appliance is considered to be a method for normal
adults to improve the stability of the entire body with the improvement of the stability
of the TMJ. The proximal improvement in stability improves of the proximal thereby
improving not only muscle strength with increased muscle activation but also stability
during exercises.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.