“…Furthermore, the prognostic role of the BNP/NT-proBNP assay was well demonstrated in primary care HF patients (17,71). Finally, compared to standard echocardiography, the BNP/ NT-proBNP assay shows lower cost and similar diagnostic accuracy (87)(88)(89)(90)(91)(92)(93)(94)(95)(96)(97)(98)(99)(100)(101), and peptide measurement may be preferred, due to its better efficiency, in screening of high-risk populations, such as elderly patients (99)(100)(101), or for assessment of diastolic dysfunction (2,104,105). Collaboration between generalists and cardiologists, rather than solo care by either, which is associated with better HF processes and outcomes of care (106), would benefit from the correct application of natriuretic peptide testing in primary care.…”