2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/940170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Predicted Exercise Capacity Equations and the Effect of Actual versus Ideal Body Weight among Subjects Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

Abstract: Background. Oxygen uptake at maximal exercise (VO2 max) is considered the best available index for assessment of exercise capacity. The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of actual versus ideal body weight in standard regression equations for predicted VO2 max results in differences in predicted VO2 max. Methods. This is a retrospective chart review of patients who were predominantly in active military duty with complaints of dyspnea or exercise tolerance and who underwent cardiopulmonary exercis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in V′O 2 peak % pred values can be partly attributed to the different prediction equations used to calculate maximal aerobic capacity. Predicted V′O 2 peak equations allow a normalised evaluation of maximal exercise capacity depending on age, height and sex but some variability has been reported depending on the equation used [56]. In the present meta-analysis, the equation used varied across studies, with four studies reporting Wasserman's equation [57], eight studies citing the American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines [58] and one study citing Jones [59]; five did not provide information.…”
Section: Sources Of Heterogeneity Between Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in V′O 2 peak % pred values can be partly attributed to the different prediction equations used to calculate maximal aerobic capacity. Predicted V′O 2 peak equations allow a normalised evaluation of maximal exercise capacity depending on age, height and sex but some variability has been reported depending on the equation used [56]. In the present meta-analysis, the equation used varied across studies, with four studies reporting Wasserman's equation [57], eight studies citing the American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines [58] and one study citing Jones [59]; five did not provide information.…”
Section: Sources Of Heterogeneity Between Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with other studies (Milano & Leite, ), our findings show that the duration of CPET in obese individuals is reduced, and their CRF is overestimated when prediction equations for non‐obese subjects are used (Ahmadian et al ., ) and may lead to systematic error in the evaluation of the CPET. Average CPET duration was close to lower limits in both sexes, and a large portion of the test subjects finished the test before 5 and 6 min, for males and females, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Praćene su i sledeće varijable: frekvencija disanja (BF), ventilatorni ekvivalent za kiseonik (VE/VO 2 ), ventilatorni ekvivalent za ugljendioksid (VE/ VCO 2 ), ekvivalent respiratorne razmene (RER). Procenat predviđenih vrednosti maksimalne potrošnje kiseonika u odnosu na godine, pol i telesnu masu (korigovan za ergometar-tredmil) je izračunat iz formula predloženih od strane Hansen i saradnika i Wasserman i saradnika (9). Predviđene vrednosti HR peak su izračunate iz formule: 220 umanjeno za godine starosti ispitanika.…”
Section: Materijal I Metodeunclassified