Background. Oxygen uptake at maximal exercise (VO2 max) is considered the best available index for assessment of exercise capacity. The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of actual versus ideal body weight in standard regression equations for predicted VO2 max results in differences in predicted VO2 max. Methods. This is a retrospective chart review of patients who were predominantly in active military duty with complaints of dyspnea or exercise tolerance and who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) from 2007 to 2009. Results. A total of 230 subjects completed CPET on a bicycle ergometer with a male predominance (62%) and an average age of 37 ± 15 years. There was significant discordance between the measured VO2 max and predicted VO2 max when measured by the Hansen and Wasserman reference equations (P < 0.001). Specifically, there was less overestimation when predicted VO2 max was based on ideal body weight as opposed to actual body weight. Conclusion. Our retrospective analysis confirmed the wide variations in predicted versus measured VO2 max based on varying prediction equations and showed the potential advantage of using ideal body weight as opposed to actual body weight in order to further standardize reference norms.
The records of 335 patients admitted to the general medicine wards and to the medical intensive and coronary care unit (MICCU) at Brooke Army Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed to assess the frequency of advance directives and "do not resuscitate" (DNR) designations. Two hundred sixty-seven (79.7%) were admitted to the ward and 68 (20.3%) were admitted to the MICCU. Advance directives were executed in 14.9% of patients. DNR designations were made for 21 (7.9%) patients on the ward and 11 (16.2%) patients in the MICCU (p = 0.064). There were no statistical differences in mean length of stay, presence of advance directives, or documentation of advance directives in ward versus MICCU patients. However, there was a statistical difference in the number of deaths in the MICCU as compared with that on the ward (9.7 vs. 2.7%, p < 0.05). The frequency of advance directives and DNR designations did not differ between ward and MICCU patients in this population, although there was a trend for greater DNR designations in the MICCU environment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.