2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00255-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of protective media and freezing techniques for cryopreservation of human semen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
56
0
11

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
56
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…7 It has been reported that several damaging processes can occur during the freezing and thawing of human spermatozoa due to thermal shock with the formation of intracellular and extracellular ice crystals, cellular dehydration, and osmotic shock. 8 The intracellular ice crystals thus formed, may breach the membranes and affect the functioning of the organelles. This can lead to impaired cell survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 It has been reported that several damaging processes can occur during the freezing and thawing of human spermatozoa due to thermal shock with the formation of intracellular and extracellular ice crystals, cellular dehydration, and osmotic shock. 8 The intracellular ice crystals thus formed, may breach the membranes and affect the functioning of the organelles. This can lead to impaired cell survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poorly motile sperm and dead sperm were discarded, and only good motile sperm were selected by [30]. Moreover, detrimental effects of freezing on spermatozoa have been reported, such as sperm mitochondria damage and sperm tail abnormality [2,31]. These lead to abnormal movement of sperm after cryopreservation, and these poorly motile sperm were eliminated by the swim-up technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that DNA damage is linked to changes in the morphology of frozen sperm samples, although this does not appear to be true according to studies done by Donnelly et al [2001a]. Stanic et al [2000] found that the use of slow programmable freezing was superior to vapor freezing and rapid programmable freezing for high quality semen samples. However, all of these freezing protocols produced notable changes in sperm cell motility as well as other parameters [Stanic et al 2000].…”
Section: Effects Of Cryopreservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stanic et al [2000] found that the use of slow programmable freezing was superior to vapor freezing and rapid programmable freezing for high quality semen samples. However, all of these freezing protocols produced notable changes in sperm cell motility as well as other parameters [Stanic et al 2000]. In contrast, other studies have shown that the conventional rapid freezing technique is a better method for preserving sperm motility than the manual slow technique.…”
Section: Effects Of Cryopreservationmentioning
confidence: 99%