2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of proton exchange membrane fuel cell static models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That main concepts include Nernst voltage, PEMFC losses (activation polarization loss, ohmic polarization loss, and concentration polarization loss), power and efficiency of the fuel cell (Amphlett 1995;Correa et al 2005;Saadi et al 2013). …”
Section: Amphlett Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That main concepts include Nernst voltage, PEMFC losses (activation polarization loss, ohmic polarization loss, and concentration polarization loss), power and efficiency of the fuel cell (Amphlett 1995;Correa et al 2005;Saadi et al 2013). …”
Section: Amphlett Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Larminie-Dicks static model presents the fuel cell voltage as a function of the current magnitude (Kim 1995;Saadi et al 2013). …”
Section: Chamberline-kim Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some models take into consideration just the steady state of the electrical part, the work of Saadi et al [14] or Ettihir et al [15] give a good comparison between different steady state electrical models. Water management in PEMFC systems is a critical point, so that plenty of models have the purpose of modeling the water transport, such as the work of Boulon et al [16].…”
Section: The Estimation Of the Liquid Water Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abraham et al [2] used artificial networks to predict the performance of complex fuel-cell systems. Saddi et al [3] compared the performance of three PEMFC models by experiments. From a system point of view, the PEMFC dynamics can be simplified for control design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%