2016
DOI: 10.1111/coa.12697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of radiologically and histologically determined thickness of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal in sixty‐six cadaveric specimens: impact on the diagnosis of Minor's Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The false appearance of dehiscence by CT of the temporal bone can sometimes be seen in patients without SCDS. [38][39][40] In some cases, a negative CT of the temporal bone but abnormal VEMP is due to dehiscence in a canal other than the superior canal. 24,e1 To confirm SCDS, cVEMP and oVEMP provide a physiologic correlate to the clinical symptoms and the temporal bone CT findings.…”
Section: Does Ovemp Accurately Identify Patients With Scds?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The false appearance of dehiscence by CT of the temporal bone can sometimes be seen in patients without SCDS. [38][39][40] In some cases, a negative CT of the temporal bone but abnormal VEMP is due to dehiscence in a canal other than the superior canal. 24,e1 To confirm SCDS, cVEMP and oVEMP provide a physiologic correlate to the clinical symptoms and the temporal bone CT findings.…”
Section: Does Ovemp Accurately Identify Patients With Scds?mentioning
confidence: 99%