2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of real and simulated records using ground motion intensity measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earthquakes are natural disaster events, and the selection of input seismic records to study earthquakes is an important issue [34,35]. Real seismic motion records are extremely important.…”
Section: Selection Of Seismic Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earthquakes are natural disaster events, and the selection of input seismic records to study earthquakes is an important issue [34,35]. Real seismic motion records are extremely important.…”
Section: Selection Of Seismic Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have tried to offer new alternative frameworks to overcome difficulties associated with the conventional nonlinear time history analyses [1][2][3]. One potential solution to address this problem is employing source-based or site-based ground motion simulation, which finds application in nonlinear time history analysis [4][5][6][7]. Additionally, researchers have examined the effectiveness of this method by comparing it with actual ground motion data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research endeavours have centred on the examination of simulation effectiveness utilising diverse methodologies across the world, covering a broad spectrum of engineering implementations. These include seismic assessment evaluations of distinct structures or investigations into seismic loss and risk assessments [1,2,3,4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%