1999
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.59.585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of recoil-induced resonances and the collective atomic recoil laser

Abstract: The theories of recoil-induced resonances (RIR) [J. Guo, P. R. Berman, B. Dubetsky and G. Grynberg, Phys. Rev. A 46, 1426(1992] and the collective atomic recoil laser (CARL) [ R. Bonifacio and L. De Salvo, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 341, 360 (1994)] are compared. Both theories can be used to derive expressions for the gain experienced by a probe field interacting with an ensemble of two-level atoms that are simultaneously driven by a pump field. It is shown that the RIR and CARL formalisms are equivalent. Diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, it does not include the effects of probe feedback, which are necessary for exponential behavior. A detailed comparison of the RIR and CARL theories is given in [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it does not include the effects of probe feedback, which are necessary for exponential behavior. A detailed comparison of the RIR and CARL theories is given in [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, in a real experiment, plenty of atoms in the condensate far away from the center with a much lower density are not included in our theoretical model. The superradiant gain is dependent on the density of the BEC, thus the collective gain does not occur below a critical density [23], then a big amount of these atoms will stay in their initial state, leading to a greater atomic population in the (0, 0) mode in experiment than that predicted by the numerical calculation.…”
Section: B Long Pulse Regimementioning
confidence: 86%
“…The certain amount of techniques for deriving the master equation is in use today, but most of them are limited to the case of the non-interacting atoms (see, for instance, [6,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31]) or frozen positions for each atom (see, for example, works [32][33][34][35][36]). A review of the relatively early developments in the theory of the effects of binary collisions on the spectral profiles is presented in [37] with respect to the simplified master equations for one-particle density matrix elements including some phenomenological items taking into account atomic transitions at the short-range collisions.…”
Section: Introduction and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%