2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2007.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of reductive accumulation of Re and Os in seawater–sediment systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few studies have successfully combined both the field-and experimental-based 159 approaches to generate mechanistic interpretations of RSM distributions in sediments and 160 pore waters (Cochran et al, 1986;Barnes and Cochran, 1993;Helz et al, 1996; 161 Yamashita et al, 2007). The research presented here also represents a bridge between 162 these two research approaches.…”
Section: Bostick Et Al (2003) Further Showed That Molybdate Adsorbs mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have successfully combined both the field-and experimental-based 159 approaches to generate mechanistic interpretations of RSM distributions in sediments and 160 pore waters (Cochran et al, 1986;Barnes and Cochran, 1993;Helz et al, 1996; 161 Yamashita et al, 2007). The research presented here also represents a bridge between 162 these two research approaches.…”
Section: Bostick Et Al (2003) Further Showed That Molybdate Adsorbs mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Betsie samples all display very low OI values, indicating there was very low oxygen content within the kerogen. Under highly reducing conditions, Re may be more readily incorporated into organic-rich material (Yamashita et al, 2007). The shale parting near the Matewan-Betsie contact is marked by high sulfur content (28 wt.%) and Re is enriched relative to Os in the presence of highly sulfidic waters (Helz and Dolor, 2012;Tripathy et al, 2014).…”
Section: Re-os Fractionation In the Betsie Shale Membermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variations in the concentration of carbonates, the major component in these samples, are small enough to explain the change in Os concentration and Os/Ir across this interval. It is well known that Os concentrations are elevated in organic rich sediments presumably via scavenging by organic matter and/or reductive accumulation of Os Cohen et al, 1999;Singh et al, 1999;Yamashita et al, 2007). Ir scavenging by organic matter seems to be comparatively less efficient as evident from Ir concentration in organic rich sediments (Colodner et al, 1992;Ravizza and Pyle, 1997), its negative correlation with organic carbon both in marine and non-marine organic sediments (Bajoumy and Peucker-Ehrenbrink, 2008) and from results of experimental studies of Ir adsorption (Dai et al, 2000).…”
Section: Response Of Osmium Burial To Paleoceonographic Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%