1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-186x(1999)20:4<244::aid-bem5>3.0.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of residential power-frequency magnetic fields away from appliances in different countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution is strikingly close to log normal, with a geometric mean of 0.032 µT, and a retransformed standard deviation of 0.031 µT. The mean phase I exposure level falls between the geometric mean levels of 0.029 and 0.037 µT, published previously for UK homes (Merchant et al, 1994a(Merchant et al, , 1994bPreece et al, 1996;Swanson and Kaune, 1999). The residential and school components of the total exposure have a similar distribution.…”
Section: Phase I Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The distribution is strikingly close to log normal, with a geometric mean of 0.032 µT, and a retransformed standard deviation of 0.031 µT. The mean phase I exposure level falls between the geometric mean levels of 0.029 and 0.037 µT, published previously for UK homes (Merchant et al, 1994a(Merchant et al, , 1994bPreece et al, 1996;Swanson and Kaune, 1999). The residential and school components of the total exposure have a similar distribution.…”
Section: Phase I Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Thus, the main sources of human ELF-MF exposure occur both through background fields originating from distant high-voltage overhead and underground power distribution lines and power transmission lines, and also fields resulting from the use of electrical appliances and devices, regardless of whether it be in an occupational (high levels of exposure over a short duration) or residential environment (generally lower exposure over an extended period of time). (Swanson & Kaune, 1999).…”
Section: Naturally Occurring Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The background fields recorded in Australia were in general, comparable with the USA (50-60 nT) (Karipidis, 2015). There are, however, differences in background fields between the USA and the UK with background fields within the UK being approximately 1.5 to 1.9 times weaker than those that resonate in North America (Swanson & Kaune, 1999). The daily average background field in the USA was measured over a 24-hour period in eight individual studies as ranging from 47-99 nT (reviewed in Swanson & Kaune, (1999)).…”
Section: Measurements Of Background Fields Have Been Conducted In Manmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations