1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-0115(97)01003-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of responses to rat and human adrenomedullin in the hindlimb vascular bed of the cat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, NP is predominantly a venodilator and has no direct inotropic effect, both of which limit the cardiac output response to hypotension (Miletich & Ivankovich 1978, Bauer & Fung 1996. In contrast, AM is mainly an arterial vasodilator (Champion et al 1997, Cockcroft et al 1997 and may increase cardiac contractility (Parkes & May 1995, Szokodi et al 1998. The exaggerated heart rate response to AM observed in the present study may be due to increased sympathetic outflow from the central nervous system resulting in a greater rise in heart rate than that expected by baroreceptor activation alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, NP is predominantly a venodilator and has no direct inotropic effect, both of which limit the cardiac output response to hypotension (Miletich & Ivankovich 1978, Bauer & Fung 1996. In contrast, AM is mainly an arterial vasodilator (Champion et al 1997, Cockcroft et al 1997 and may increase cardiac contractility (Parkes & May 1995, Szokodi et al 1998. The exaggerated heart rate response to AM observed in the present study may be due to increased sympathetic outflow from the central nervous system resulting in a greater rise in heart rate than that expected by baroreceptor activation alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Accordingly, CTPR fell more for a given fall in arterial pressure with AM than NP. The available evidence points to AM being a potent vasodilator (Champion et al 1997, Cockcroft et al 1997. A likely explanation for cardiac output being increased more with AM is that, compared with NP, AM has less venodilatory action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with previous studies in euvolemic animals, there was a reduction in CTPR which would also tend to promote increased cardiac output due to reduced afterload. Thus, available evidence points to ADM being a potent vasodilator probably via a direct action of ADM on arterial tone (Champion et al 1997, Cockcroft et al 1997. Although extrapolation from acute to chronic states should be made with caution, these findings suggest that the elevated levels of ADM observed in heart failure may provide a compensatory effect maintaining cardiac output and reducing afterload in the face of inappropriate volume expansion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adrenomedullin has vasorelaxant properties in animal models (Champion et al 1997) and in humans (Cockcroft et al 1997, Lainchbury et al 2000, Troughton et al 2000. CNP also has vasodilator properties, but its precise role under physiological and pathophysiological circumstances remains ill defined (Espiner et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%