2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2016.08.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of rotating packed bed and packed bed absorber in pilot plant and model simulation for CO 2 capture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With its intense fluid dynamics and mass transfer, low absorbent concentrations can be used in RPBs to achieve similar performance to that of a large conventional absorber column. Chamchan et al [53] observed that both the RPB and conventional packed bed absorbers demonstrated similar absorption performance and energy consumption in CO 2 capture at pilot scale but the RPB was associated with a 1/3 volume reduction compared to the conventional packed bed. In CC from flue gas with low CO 2 concentration, Xie et al [52] demonstrated the RPB to be capable of achieving a mass transfer coefficient around 2.7x higher than in a packed column, with a corresponding 2.6x reduction in equipment volume.…”
Section: Rotating Packed Bed Absorbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With its intense fluid dynamics and mass transfer, low absorbent concentrations can be used in RPBs to achieve similar performance to that of a large conventional absorber column. Chamchan et al [53] observed that both the RPB and conventional packed bed absorbers demonstrated similar absorption performance and energy consumption in CO 2 capture at pilot scale but the RPB was associated with a 1/3 volume reduction compared to the conventional packed bed. In CC from flue gas with low CO 2 concentration, Xie et al [52] demonstrated the RPB to be capable of achieving a mass transfer coefficient around 2.7x higher than in a packed column, with a corresponding 2.6x reduction in equipment volume.…”
Section: Rotating Packed Bed Absorbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigations have studied the capture of CO 2 in an RPB using various alkanolamine solutions, including monoethanolamine (MEA), 2‐amino‐2‐methyl‐1‐propanol (AMP), methyl‐diethanolamine (MDEA), 2‐(2‐aminoethylamino)ethanol (AEEA), diethanolamine (DEA), diethylenetriamine (DETA), 2‐methyl‐amino‐ethanol (MMEA) and piperazine (PZ) . Alkanolamines that react rapidly with CO 2 , such as MEA, MMEA, AEEA, DETA, and PZ are favored because of the short residence time in an RPB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sheng et al examined the performance of CO 2 capture by the solutions of DETA/PZ with a total concentration of 30 wt% . Chamchan et al used an RPB for the removal of CO 2 with 30 wt% MEA solution in a pilot plant and found that the volume of the RPB was approximately one‐third that of a packed column . Wu et al proposed an absorbent with a composition of 4 m PZ/4 m DETA exhibiting high CO 2 capture efficiency and low regeneration energy in an RPB .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations