1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(98)00393-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of simplified methods for pesticide residue analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to enhance the detection sensitivity without any concentration of the solvent by a nitrogen gas stream, as described above, several large-volume injection (LVI) techniques have been proposed 1,2 for a gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Also, several applications of the LVI techniques for the analysis of pesticides have been reported; [3][4][5][6][7] however, there are few applications to dioxin analysis. [8][9][10][11] The representative LVI methods were a programmable temperature vaporizing (PTV) injection method [12][13][14] and a largevolume on-column injection method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to enhance the detection sensitivity without any concentration of the solvent by a nitrogen gas stream, as described above, several large-volume injection (LVI) techniques have been proposed 1,2 for a gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Also, several applications of the LVI techniques for the analysis of pesticides have been reported; [3][4][5][6][7] however, there are few applications to dioxin analysis. [8][9][10][11] The representative LVI methods were a programmable temperature vaporizing (PTV) injection method [12][13][14] and a largevolume on-column injection method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPE is widely applied in the analysis of organic compounds because it reduces the consumption of solvents, has fewer stages, avoids emulsions, and is less laborious and more efficient; therefore it is a very suitable technique for automation [6,7]. Due to the separation efficiency, the CGC should be the separation technique and the mass spectrometer, the most appropriate detector [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%